Charlie Gard Not Allowed To Leave For Treatment Again

They really want to kill that little baby:

Charlie Gard’s parents appeared in court again Friday to discuss the next step in his case.

In the course of the hearing, British high court Justice Francis said their son cannot be moved to the United States for treatment without a court order, squashing hope that a move to grant him residency in the U.S. would help him…

Earlier this week, U.S. Congressional leaders approved a measure to grant Charlie and his parents permanent residency status in an effort to make it easier for him to receive an experimental treatment. Pro-life Congresswoman Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-Washington, led the effort; her daughter also was diagnosed with a fatal condition but survived because of an experimental treatment.

Chris Gard and Connie Yates want to take their son to the United States for an experimental treatment. They raised more than $1.5 million for his care. His parents said they know the chance of the experimental treatment working is slim, but they want to try anyway for Charlie’s sake.

A part of me wonders if this is somehow tied to the subconscious realization this child will require a ton of rearing effort, and that is triggering a fierce urge to just kill it so they can put it out of their mind.

The study of developmental neurobiology has shown that infant neural structures have developmental windows, where they can grow at astonishing rates – and repair damage similarly fast. When the baby is born, their eyes, ears, and other senses flood the brain with data courtesy of their nerves, but the brain is actually not designed to understand that data. Because a structure like the eye forms spontaneously in the embryo from a mass of cells that is not standardized in exact cell to cell form, embryo to embryo, it assembles optical receptors and nerves on the fly in a random pattern. Those nerves flow into the brain, carrying signals differently in every baby. The way the infant has developed to turn those signals into sight is to have a brain that at birth is capable of astonishing adaptivity. Those signals flow in differently in each baby, and each visual processing structure in the brain learns to turn each different set of signals into a visual representation on the fly, by growing very quickly.

In babies born with a cataract disorder that blocked light from hitting the retina, they used to wait to operate and remove the cataract until the child was ten or eleven, thinking that because the structure was larger physically, the operation would be safer. But those children’s brains were robbed of the visual signals during their early developmental window, and thus that rapid brain growth never happened. By age eleven, even when the eye was fixed, their the signals were sent exactly as they would have been normally, but their brain structures never adapted to turn the eye’s signals into sight right, and they were practically blinded. As a result, they now operate on those babies at birth to remove the cataract, so their eyes can send visual signals, and their brains can exploit that developmental window, and the babies grow up to see just fine.

Once they age out of the developmental window, the brain cements itself into the structure it has, and further growth and repair will be exceedingly slow, if at all. This baby’s mitochondria have been failing to produce sufficient energy for cellular processes, such as neural activity, and this has certainly caused developmental failure in the structures designed to use that activity to learn how to grow. Every day he is denied treatment the damage his adult brain will exhibit is increased, and he is losing a day from his early developmental window to repair it, should the experimental treatment work and restore mitochondrial function.

These government bureaucrats are literally maiming this child every day they delay its treatment, and they are doing that all in the hopes they can finally kill it at some point.

Tell me our leftist governments haven’t evolved into evil incarnate.

It says a lot about the degeneracy of r-selection that the Apocalypse, such a tornado of violence, chaos, anarchy, and death, will be such a cleansing force for our civilizations.

Tell everyone about r/K Theory because there is only one ideology that doesn’t care about children

This entry was posted in ITZ, Liberals, Morals, Politics, Psychology, r-stimuli, rabbitry, Rearing Differences. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
6 years ago

[…] Charlie Gard Not Allowed To Leave For Treatment Again […]

Sam J.
Sam J.
6 years ago

If the problem was that they couldn’t provide for every child and didn’t want to make an exception they could have just Kept quite. Now they look like ruthless baby killers. Which is exactly what they are. Forcing the parents to stay in the country to kill the child. Someone should smuggle them out of the country.

Pitcrew
Pitcrew
6 years ago

By delaying any possible treatment for months they severely reduced this child’s chances. They knew that’s what they were doing, and they wanted him to die, going brain dead first. No way NHS is going to get upstaged by a bunch of American doctors, no matter how many dead British babies it takes.

Andy
Andy
6 years ago

I disagree with you. Letting the child die because its not able to live is the eugenic choice. The Parents were at their 30s when they had the child, which is already to old for a female to produce good oocytes. The boy was sickly and his life would be most likely totaly dependent on medication and experimental treatments. I rather see this as the first step in the direction where the people will enforce healthy offspringe by just letting the sick ones die.