Are We All Charlie Hebdo?

Vox makes the case we should stand with Charlie Hebdo on principle. Perhaps.

The problem I see is, the left imported the Muslim threat. Then the leftists at Charlie Hebdo inflamed it with leftist snark to the point that it began shooting at them, and even killed innocent citizens in the Kosher Deli. Now they want everyone to “stand with them,” which really means fight the enemy they imported and angered, while they hide under the table, so they won’t have to face the consequences of their own stupidity.

The New York Times Newspaper Headline on The Charlie Hebdo Attacks

The New York Times Newspaper Headline on The Charlie Hebdo Attacks

Indeed, the rabbits in the media can’t even be persuaded to publish the new Charlie Hebdo cartoon, in their articles about it. The NY Times article on the new cartoon made it a point to mention twice that they would not publish it, lest any future jihadi mistaken believe that they would consider offending radical Islamist sensibilities and target the Times, instead of the Police and Military personnel the rabbits want to fight this battle for them. Oxford University Press will expect that everyone else will fight for them, even as they ban any mention of pigs or pork in their books, lest some Muslim somewhere get offended and try to target them specifically. Obama himself is so uncommitted to this fight that he couldn’t even find one administration official to march in France, in token support of the victims of the attacks.

The radical Muslims need to be killed when they do this type of thing. Nor should we tolerate that type of violence in our society. But what if we made it clear that our position was that the Muslims could have at the leftist rabbits, and that we didn’t want to get involved in the fight? What would the left do, if every police officer, military man, and patriotic citizen said, “No, we aren’t Charlie Hebdo. We didn’t want to import the radical Muslims to begin with, and we aren’t the ones who then went out of our way to piss them off. You Leftists created this entire problem yourself, now you can go deal with it yourself. You are not our people, and they are only killing you, so why should we get involved?

That would be more logical. The only difference compared to what the left is doing now would be that we wouldn’t haven’t started the fight that the leftists would then pay for. Now it is the left importing the fighters, starting the fight, drawing us into it, and then seeking to avoid the conflict by not offending the enemy, so the enemy will focus on us. As one article on it noted,

Every media outlet that refuses to publish the image raises the risk, however marginally, to the ones who do. That’s why Charlie Hebdo was targeted to begin with. A small French paper shouldn’t be on jihadis’ radar screens, but if they’re one of only a handful globally willing to publish images of Mohammed…

More and more, I think we need to split the population into r and K, and let the r’s fend for themselves. There would be no better way to train their amygdala to realize that actions have consequences, than to let them think that when they import radical ideologies, they will not be rescued by anyone else from having to live under the rules of that radical ideology. If a gay promiscuous woman supports importing a radical Muslim, then let her answer to him when she wants to drive, learn to read, dress comfortably, wear makeup, engage in lesbianism, or have affairs with other men’s wives. If she can’t sway her imported radical friend’s judgment, why should we then have to step in with force on her behalf? After the radical Muslims spend a few decades culling the low-hanging fruit that is the helpless rabbit herd, then we could step in and remove the threat before it begins presenting itself to us.

An additional advantage would be that by that time, few rabbits would balk at doing what needed to be done. Now, the rabbit’s position seems to be, “Surround us as we offend the violent Muslims we just imported, so when they start killing people, you will die first.”

That is a fool’s proposition, offered by cowards and imbeciles. We would be equally stupid to ally with them.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
9 years ago

[…] Are We All Charlie Hebdo? […]

Adam Dorsey
Adam Dorsey
9 years ago

This reminded me of Revelation 9:4

4 They were told not to harm the grass of the earth or any plant or tree, but only those people who did not have the seal of God on their foreheads.

TroperA
TroperA
9 years ago

If you want a laugh, watch this moron’s video:

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/the-big-picture/9994-Je-Suis-Charlie-Comics

As you can tell from the prodigious blathering (which really leads up to nothing) and the Moral Relativism, he’s a leftist. He also apparently has no idea what Charlie Hebdo was (believing that they were pretty much a French version of MAD magazine) and he also has no idea that Charlie Hebdo was pro-immigrant. (He seems to think their anti-Islamic cartoons were racist and meaniehead jabs at the immigrant population.) He also ALSO believes that only governments can inhibit free speech and that totalitarianism is fine as long as it’s used to “punch up” at Oppressor populations.

All of MovieBob’s output is pretty much the same. He’s the Platonic Ideal of a Modern Leftist and a good baseline to go by if you’re looking for examples of leftist behavior to show to others.

Heywood Jablome
9 years ago

More and more, I think we need to split the population into r and K, and let the r’s fend for themselves. There would be no better way to train their amygdala to realize that actions have consequences, than to let them think that when they import radical ideologies, they will not be rescued by anyone else from having to live under the rules of that radical ideology.

I like the idea, but I wonder how to implement it. The rabbits surround us. They’re mixed in with us. How do we go about “abandoning” them to the orcs?

Heywood Jablome
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
9 years ago

That might work if enough of our people use that approach. So far, few of us know about the r/K framework for politics.

I hope Bill Whittle can get your book into Ted Cruz’s hands & turn him into an r/K paladin.

I wonder who else is a messaging “force multiplier” like Bill is? Maybe I should send copies of your book to Evan Sayet, Rob Lowe, David Mamet, Sabo, and Robert Downey, Jr.

Heywood Jablome
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
9 years ago

Sending this book to a handful of people is a negligible expense, with a potentially huge benefit. I’m Perfectly happy to invest <$100 for the chance to save society.

DevilMeNot
DevilMeNot
9 years ago

Finally, someone tells the whole unvarnished truth. Thank you so much for making
this idiotic world make”sense” to me. Too bad you’re not on CNN, to explain to the
adult children watching Romper Room{ or Blue’s Clues, if you are a bit younger} aka
The Situation Room.{ Wolf Blitzer should have a Magic Mirror to see{name} the audience How about explaining the situation they{ the media} has caused?
No, we are not all Charlie Hebdo. Have a great day AC, and thanks for putting the
truth out there.

DevilMeNot
DevilMeNot
9 years ago

For the Blue’s Clues fans that watch CNN- maybe” Steve” could come out of retirement
with his blue dog and help Wolfie get a “clue” as to what the situation is. Does anyone
else see the irony in Wolf Blitzer’s name?

DevilMeNot
DevilMeNot
9 years ago

What in the hell did Movie Bob {more like Movie Boob} actually say? Double speak
at it’s finest. I wonder if this asshat has considered becoming an auctioneer? He should
be a senator or Avon lady.

bomb mecca
bomb mecca
9 years ago

Why should obama go to the 70th anniversary of the liberation of auschwitz no muslims died there. The republicans should send a jewish congressman if there are any.

trackback
9 years ago

[…] ConservativeJanuary 22, 2015Are We All Charlie Hebdo?[I have nothing to […]