Clinton Foundation Not Rated By Charity Navigator

I love this Charity Navigator page on the Clinton Foundation:

Why isn’t this organization rated?

We had previously evaluated this organization, but have since determined that this charity’s atypical business model can not be accurately captured in our current rating methodology. Our removal of The Clinton Foundation from our site is neither a condemnation nor an endorsement of this charity. We reserve the right to reinstate a rating for The Clinton Foundation as soon as we identify a rating methodology that appropriately captures its business model.
What does it mean that this organization isn’t rated?

It simply means that the organization doesn’t meet our criteria. A lack of a rating does not indicate a positive or negative assessment by Charity Navigator.

In other words, to paraphrase a common meme, “They are guilty as hell, but we do not want to die suddenly and mysteriously!”

Charity Navigator does a fairly simple assessment of how much money the charity takes in, and how much it spends on actual charity.

A military charity like Fisher House, which spends 93.4% of its income on actual charity gets five stars. It is very simple.

The only way I can see the Clinton Foundation not being rated is that there is no real means of figuring out how much money comes in, and how much of what does come in, goes out. What is funny is how afraid everyone is of this Clinton Crime Machine.

The shocker about the Clinton Foundation?

Asset Amount $354,190,170

Income Amount $184,422,359

And that is the admitted numbers. Who know how accurate they are. With Hillary at State that account could be ten times that.

Interesting in light of the fact that Bill has a little-known shell corporation set up which is kept zero’d out so it doesn’t have to file any records – something reports on it say is common for money laundering.

Describing it as a “pass-through account” that holds no assets for any length of time, Corsi points out that by emptying the account to zero following each transaction, the Clintons avoid having to publicly disclose the account.

Funds passing through WJC LLC could end up in offshore accounts, money market accounts or other investments without any public scrutiny, Corsi explains.

Crooked Hillary is about as accurate a moniker as Trump could have come up with.

This entry was posted in Liberals, Politics, Psychology, r-stimuli, rabbitry, Trump. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
7 years ago

[…] Clinton Foundation Not Rated By Charity Navigator […]

Robert What?
Robert What?
7 years ago

It is time to let Bernie Madoff out of prison with a full apology.

Ron
Ron
7 years ago

I prefer to call her “the butcher of Arkansas”.

trackback
7 years ago

[…] What this says to me is that there is an incredible level of corruption out there. Charity Navigator’s whole purpose is to rate charitable foundations. They previously stated that they do not rate the Clinton Foundation because it’s model is atyp…. […]