Liberals Hate Cops For a Reason

Imagine I was a news anchor. On TV, a neo-nazi was stealing some transgender man’s purse. The robber ran to a car, shut the door on the transgender man’s hair, and begins driving off. The transgender guy falls to the pavement, and begins being dragged down the street by the side of the car, his bedazzled miniskirt glittering as he rolls from side to side to spread the road rash out. As the anchor, I begin laughing, and say, “Technically, is the tranny still chasing the car, if he’s being dragged along behind it?” Ha ha ha.

I’m not the biggest fan of the LGBT-SJW mafia lately, what with their trying to bankrupt innocent people who just don’t want to deal with them. I very firmly believe if someone doesn’t want to deal with me, it is their God-given right to enjoy a world free of me. Anyone who demands the right to intrude on the life or business of another is a Nazi in every sense of the word. If they try to force the issue through laws and government, then they are a coward to boot, as any man willing to commit such a sin on another should have the balls to force the issue themselves, face to face, not through some cowardly bureaucratic procedure.

Yet even though I am not an LGBT-mafia fan, I would never have thought to be so insensitive, or even been able to be so insensitive, had I thought of it.

Viewed in that context, this MSNBC tweet similarly mocking a Police officer being dragged by a perp betrays a true underlying hatred. Adding to the irony, not only is that cop potentially being dragged to his death, he is potentially being dragged to his death in the course of selflessly risking his life to make the world safe for the rabbits. Short of mocking a Marine who dives on a hand grenade to save his buddies, it is tough to imagine something more loathsome.

There is a greater gulf brewing. Local law enforcement is drawn from the local community. As local citizens of the community, local police are much less likely to engage in immoral or oppressive behaviors on the communities they police than an outside force would. The people they would be oppressing would be their neighbors and friends, and if that weren’t enough, their neighbors and friends would have much greater recourse politically, should they have cause to unite against the local department. In addition, since the leaders of local law enforcement are selected via a method much closer to the local community, they will tend to have more principles, and be of a high moral fiber. We have seen that recently with local sheriffs refusing to enforce certain gun laws they believe would infringe on the rights of their citizens. Federal law enforcement would never question the legal or moral propriety of any such law before grinding any citizen who disobeyed it into the ground.

Federal law enforcement, as an outside force, is also much more likely to view the local community as outsiders, and much less likely to factor in the interests of the local community when given orders. After decades of moving in to a community, doing what they wanted, and occasionally even walking all over local citizens with little cost to themselves, it is easy to come to view those civilians around you as just potential obstacles to be dealt with as you please. Liberals recently have begun to realize this dichotomy in the law enforcement world as well.

One of the most ominous stories I have heard recently is Obama deciding to restrict the issuance of military surplus to local law enforcement. Note, how he said nothing of federal law enforcement, which will continue to receive these surplus items freely. Obama, or more accurately the eggheads who tell Obama what to say, have done the math and they have decided they don’t want local law enforcement to be too capable tactically in the coming unrest. In the coming unrest, the liberals are hoping local law enforcement will simply be the cannon-fodder that federal law enforcement will use to secure central control over the populace.

By itself this edict might mean little. However, combined with an imminent economic collapse, the massive increase in the domestic surveillance state, the chatter coming out of DC about Conservatives, veterans, and the Tea Party being viewed as terrorist threats to the government, and the unlawful use of federal agencies such as the IRS, the EPA, and OSHA to target Conservatives, a very ominous image emerges. This is a federal power-grab, designed to take effect when the wheels come off.

Not since the height of the Roman Empire’s surplus of conquest booty and slave labor have resources been so freely applied to a nation – or corrupted large parts of it so thoroughly. The main difference between then and now will be the speed and the depth of the collapse when it comes, the quality of the “good” citizens who value freedom, and the lethality of the heavily armed citizen populace. We quite literally have cities full of heavily-armed and short-tempered addicts, about to see their drug of choice withdrawn completely, and heavily armed citizen-soldiers with an immutable sense of right, wrong, and no questions regarding the propriety of violence under the right moral circumstances.

Clearly people at the top are maneuvering, but how much good it will do them is unknown. My guess is, for all their desire to seize some type of control the feds will be lucky to keep half of our major population centers alive once the heavily armed gangs and thugs realize how vulnerable the rabbits are – and how much more they “unfairly” have. It will be redistribution – but not the type liberal rabbits normally contemplate.

I have no idea exactly what is coming, but judging from the metrics biologically, it will be historic. Vox is right. Be grateful. Most people enjoy reading about major events in history. Whatever comes for us, we will be able to say we saw one firsthand.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dave
Dave
8 years ago

What you speculate about is already happening in Iraq, where Federal troops are running home to Baghdad and leaving behind tons of sophisticated weapons for ISIS to pick up and use against them.

Federals are less concerned with the needs of the local populace, but this lack of investment makes them more inclined to flee in the face of serious resistance.

Aeoli Pera
8 years ago

>We quite literally have cities full of heavily-armed and short-tempered addicts, about to see their drug of choice withdrawn completely, and heavily armed citizen-soldiers with an immutable sense of right, wrong, and no questions regarding the propriety of violence under the right moral circumstances.

I believe you are wrong about the latter part. Many of the armed folks are rule-followers, i dotters and t crossers. If I were a superintelligent sociopath, I’d erect a giant edifice of rules for owning firearms while pretending to increase the availability of them, and then order the rule-followers to disarm the low-IQ (and ugly) rule-breakers. Felons can’t be allowed to own guns, after all. Pot is a felony, and why not sexual harassment? Really, any sexual harassment case is a sexual offense. Did you know the sex offender in your neighborhood is also a gun nut?

Then I’d split up the small number of rule-followers and send them to the gulag. Afterward the rest of the population can be “population-controlled” with simpler methods.

dc.sunsets
dc.sunsets
8 years ago

To me, order arises from the ground up, not the top down. It therefore arises in an environment of liberty when mixed with certain other philosophical principles, and its opponent is (the aggregation, or arrogation, of) power. Power today largely means the political sphere, whose enforcement cadre are cops.

What we know as modern policing didn’t even exist during most of the rise and peak of Western Civilization. I aver that the very notion of the state (a widely-accepted monopoly on the first use of coercion), rising to the point of leaving no aspect of human existence unregulated, having a virtually unaccountable enforcement arm is troubling, at best. We get the “government” to which our neighbors consent, as Boetie’s “Discourses” axiomatically prove, so I suppose the cops simply reflect a deeper consensus of the deluded masses.

As our path descends into the Valley of Difficulty ahead, organization will beat disorganization and tribes will be oases of (relative) safety between the no-man’s-land of isolation & “don’t-fit-in.” While I am nervous around cops simply because, like a black bear, they represent a potential threat to me even if I’m minding my own business. The need to join Organization, however, compels me to accept the small(ish) danger of their presence, so I’m doing my best to get over it and join the tribe for which my physical attributes qualify me.

As always, the Narrative is only tangentially related to reality. Seeing Prince Georges County, MD cops abuse people on Youtube is part of the “bad cops” Narrative, but it is meaningless where I live, given the decency of the cops here in my experience. Perhaps it has always been so, but the Youtube/Smartphone era communicates very well a lot of very inaccurate generalizations. I know that I struggle to ignore that which is not meaningful (to me) in the barrage of data selected by others and thrown at my eyes, and embrace for my OODA loop only data that actually have merit.