Somali Cop Fails To Receive K-strategist Support?

Looks like it:

After the officer was identified, people on social media noticed the difference in reaction to the case.

Black Lives Matter showed their support after the killing of the unarmed, white woman…

Some have commented on how they related to #BLM more after the shooting…

However, many have noticed the silence from typical #BlueLIvesMatter supporters…

Some have even called for the deportation or execution of Noor

This appears to be a mistaken ID, and accidental shoot. There are a lot of conspiracy theories around, from sudden jihad syndrome, to some sort of skullduggery, but those seem unlikely. This was a guy whose amygdala was overloaded due to his divorce issues, he likely had diminished capacity to begin with due to being Somalian, and the current environment of police shootings mixed with a possible loud noise just overloaded him and led to pulling the trigger prior to a full threat assessment.

My guess is he will walk, since cops generally get one bad shoot based on the theory everyone makes a mistake sooner or later. If it isn’t intentional, it is tough to punish them for an honest mistake after they volunteered to serve. He will end up out of his position in patrol, if for no other reason than legal liability, but I doubt he’ll get jail unless something else comes out showing gross negligence. Then again there is a lot of emotion, so nothing is guaranteed in these days of high amygdala.

What is interesting is K-strategists are abandoning their normal reflexive police support, and protesting against this. I suspect some probably have the typical in-grouping of K-strategists which oppose the wanton importation of foreigners and the particularly threatening Muslims.

Some may have amygdala pathways irritated by Somalians which they are barely aware of, laid down during the Blackhawk Down incident when several of our soldiers were dragged through the streets by half-witted Somalis for trying to civilize their perpetual shithole of a nation. My guess is, if he was a non-hyphenated American of any color, who didn’t practice a religion whose followers had attacked our nation, and was hired in a meritocratic system, nobody would be getting triggered on the K-side over this. Instead the whole thing has triggers galore.

Here is an article describing the hiring process, which involves some sort of oblique psychological test, designed to weed out any sexist personalities, racist personalities, and promote diversity (which would seem racist itself as it has to exclude some based on race).

Many, myself included, are triggered at the importation of thousands of people that practice a religion hostile to America, who will probably never be able to integrate because they have an average IQ of 68, which in the US is low enough to allow the state to take your children:

So the State of Oregon put the boy in foster care… The state has taken a couple’s children away not because they’re abusing or neglecting the kids but because it thinks the parents aren’t smart enough to raise them properly.

Ziegler and his partner, Amy Fabbrini, both have below-average IQs—72 and 66, respectively—according to documents provided to The Oregonian…

This year the couple had a second son, Hunter. The state also took custody of him. This time they didn’t even wait to see how they’d behave as parents: Fabbrini was still in the hospital when they took the boy.

Oregon’s justification for taking Christopher and Hunter away: “limited cognitive abilities that interfere with [their] ability to safely parent.”

Do we now have to pay for the state to raise half of the children of migrants from nations where the average IQ is sub-70? Will CPS be taking all children of immigrants with sub-70 IQ’s, from the below nations? And why, if they can’t think clearly enough to raise children, can they vote on how to run our government?

IQ matters. It can be used as a proxy for reaction time in studies on relative cognitive ability. I will bet it relates to amygdala development. If you hire based on politics instead of meritocratically you can get people killed. That is what K-strategists are so angry about here.

If you want to hire Veterans, or LE or Veteran legacy hires, the former will favor environmental amygdala development, while the latter will probably favor epigenetic amygdala development, so that can be justified logically as much as morally. But hiring Somali Muslims just for the press release, or to placate the Somali Muslim community is a bad idea. It will turn the K-selected community against the government for instinctual reasons that are uncontrollable, when one of them has a bad shoot that appears as if it could have been avoided with a better quality recruit. K-strategists want meritocracy, not liberal fantasy hires based on an imaginary universal equality of all.

Notice we have the old theme of liberals producing circumstances that kill K-strategists by importing foreigners who kill wantonly, and putting them in positions to take out indigenous K-strategists. Maybe they didn’t import a savage criminal with this one, but K-strategists see the same theme of foreign immigrants imported by liberals increasing mortality among the decent people, just as liberals want, and it is triggering to the K’s.

We exist as different races and nationalities for a reason. Instinctually in history we have often closed ranks, in-grouped with like kind, and kept the outsiders at bay. Because of that, diverse America will never work once K-selection hits, and those instincts arise.

As Chateau Heartiste has said, Diversity + Proximity = War.

Or as r/K Theory might postulate, (Diversity + Proximity) x Shortage = War

ITZ coming.

Tell everyone about r/K Theory, because it is all coming apart eventually

This entry was posted in Conservatives, Immigration, K-stimuli, Muslims, Politics, Psychology, rabbitry, Splintering. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
6 years ago

[…] Looks like it: After the officer was identified, people on social media noticed the difference in reaction to the case. Black Lives Matter showed their support after the killing of the continue […]

John Calabro
John Calabro
6 years ago

How much of the low Bluematte response be also affect by who actually got shot?
Since she was an white Australian woman in her 40s and was in her pajamas. The cop had his body camera off and shot from the car as she approach the driver side. She had not commit any crime and was set to be married the month after.She also help people out in the community recovering depression.

I think in my opinion since many of the Blue lives matter are K that they would come out strong on this matter and I think even if the cop was not Somalian that they would do it. They probably see like I do and see it as a great lost of life that might of been avoided. The cop turning off the body camera doesn’t help the matter.

What do you think?

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/7/17/15985442/minneapolis-police-shooting-justine-damond-video

https://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2017/07/minneapolis-police-shoot-australian/533904/

Robert What?
Robert What?
6 years ago

I have a different theory as to why he shot her: target practice. She was White and he hates Whites, and he knew that Minneapolis is not going to fire or prosecute their first Somalipolice officer. So he decided to have his fun.

Pitcrew
Pitcrew
6 years ago

(Diversity + Proximity) x Shortage = War

Brilliant AC. I always felt this was reality. It explains much of the urban racial behavior after cities decayed, especially in the rust belt. Perfect example: Ray Nagin’s “Chocolate City” speech.