A French Academic Proposes Giving French Muslims Their Own State

From one bad idea to another:

A French academic has suggested creating a Muslim state within France in order to prevent a civil war.

Professor Christian de Moliner claims that a second society has formed in France, which he described as: “A branch that wants to settle their lives on religious values and is fundamentally opposed to the liberal consensus on which our country was founded.

“We can never convert the 30% of Muslims who demand the introduction of sharia law to the merits of our democracy and secularism.

“We are now allowing segregation to take place that does not say its name. Rather than veil the face or adopt unimaginable measures in democracy (remigration, forced evictions of the most radical), why not establish a dual system of law in France?”

Out-grops cannot exist in peace in close proximity.

The problem when you have two opposed groups facing off is that those groups have a baseline of amygdala that motivates hostility at all times. That baseline amygdala needs relief. Relief comes from feeling that the other group has endured some cost. But amygdalae tend to adapt their perceptions to normalize any relief – something they do with pleasures much more readily than they do with hostilities.

So if group A and group B are in contact, they will always feel hostility for each other, and that will always provoke aggression, until it is relieved by some sort of acting out. If group A hits group B, it will feel better, and that will attenuate the hatred somewhat. But it doesn’t last. Even if Group B takes the hit, as the West is increasingly shown itself willing to do (due to increased resources and pleasure deadening amygdala, producing increased r and less baseline amygdala-angst), group A’s angst will naturally rise as they adapt to see the relief as normal, and they will hit again to seek another bout of relief above the new normal baseline.

These things tend to inevitably seek a balance of amygdala on each side, before forcing the two sides to war. Eventually group B will reach the point where it will have sufficient amygdala from the endured attacks to hit back. Eventually it will have to, or group A will just keep hitting until it has destroyed or taken over group B entirely.

Behind all of it is resource availability. If the resources are high, amygdalae can be deadened some and these things can fester. But when the resources plummet, they conflagrate. Clearly even French academics now are realizing the Muslims will never assimilate, itself a sign of increasing amygdalae.

For now, satiated French amygdalae are trying to find a way forward that doesn’t involve Holocaust 2.0, The Muslim Edition. But let resources plummet, and the Muslims will quickly be scapegoated for all the sins of the Western elites, in addition to their own rapes, robberies, and murders. And once the French treat the Muslims as enemies, the Muslims will rapidly reciprocate.

At that point, it will become clear where those antiquated notions of borders and citizenships came from. It will also become clear why Europe was a Christian nation that frowned on other religions in the past. It wasn’t to discriminate against other religions, so much as to avoid the mass bloodshed that allowing other religions to gain a foothold would produce.

It is kind of funny. We view the ideas of no borders and welcomed foreigners as insane while the left would feel the same way about the old times of Christian dominance and assiduous discrimination against outsiders. But the human brain is smarter than us, and the truth is the left’s strategy is probably a good way to avoid mortality and conflict in times of high resources. The only problem is the left has no idea that resources are about to constrict, and that when they do you will need to behave differently.

They’re about to get an awakening.

Tell everyone about r/K Theory, because amygdalae will not allow compromise

This entry was posted in Amygdala, Decline, Economic Collapse, Europe, Immigration, In-grouping, ITZ, K-stimuli, Liberals, Migrant Crime Deniers, Muslims, Nationalism, Out-grouping, Politics, Psychology, rabbitry, Splintering, War. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cecil Henry
6 years ago

This is an actual quote from Justin the Traitor. It was checked twice… no denials from PM.

Its just atrocious, but its fully consistent with government action for 30 years.

This is a war:

comment image

“The very concept of a nation founded by European settlers is offensive to me. Old stock White Canadians are an unpleasant relic, and quite frankly, replaceable. And we will replace them.”
– Justin Trudeau, when asked to comment on his Open Borders immigration strategy.

Andy
Andy
Reply to  Cecil Henry
6 years ago

A meme is not a source ma dude.

Musashi
Musashi
6 years ago

Imagine the fortune to be made in Europe as part of a mercenary “Expulsion Force” cleansing the West of degenerate White traitors and wretched Muslims.

Pitcrew
Pitcrew
6 years ago

Hopefully France never hands over its nukes or nuclear power plants to muslims. That could cause some very serious consequences.

Pitcrew
Pitcrew
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
6 years ago

AC, Americans and Russians will work together to disarm France and the UK if they put on the hijab. Spetsnaz, Delta and ST6 will make mincemeat out them. It will happen so rapidly they won’t know what hit them.

Andy
Andy
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
6 years ago

Putin is having a good laugh about this. The muslims in france hate each other more then they hate the french and their muslim proto state would rather go at war with other little pissy muslim proto states. Watch and enjoy.
Also, the US didn’t play chess. The russians thought they played chess and waited for that one big move that would set them Checkmate and it didn’t come. Star Wars was the pawn that broke the red camels back. They won’t make that mistake twice.

John Calabro
John Calabro
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
6 years ago

Well that is if we can wake up. What do you think a Post Apologetic World will look like after a war with Nukes?

I would have a guess that it might be like mad max at first with many human tribes killing each other for food, water and fuel.
Over time about another 100 or so years it would become something like the start of the 1968 Planet of the Apes. The environment would start to come back with plants growing back and radiation fading. Humans at this point I am guessing will still be but both few in numbers (humans that both survive the fallout and the tribal warfare) would of lost much of the wisdom and civilization.The biggest things in this world would be still conquering clean water and fuel. Most of the earth water at this stage would be more dangerous than any other time in history. Two groups of human will start to form. Ones that can drink the radioactive water and the ones that can’t but made or had access to radioactive filters or untouched water. I don’t think i would have to tell the difference in the type of evolution these two would have. Which one you think will have to use their brain’s more?

I am also guessing it at the very least take another 1000 to 2000 years to even come close to the civilization we have now.

Depressing isn’t it. It would be great if we could instead either get rid of the nuclear weapons so that we can go to war without the risk of nuclear fallout or find a way to kill each other with something like dueling or a Hungry Games for tribes. Thoughts?

987987998987932879_730YUcj1
987987998987932879_730YUcj1
6 years ago

Broke: Wanting to create an islamic state inside of France to avoid civil war.

Joke: Being against the creation of said islamic state.

Woke: Wanting to create an islamic state inside of France to avoid civil war by putting the all the muslims in the same place and bombing them to shit pre-emptively.

Robert What?
6 years ago

The idea of a Muslim state within France is a fool’s dream, unless as you observed, resources are absolutely unlimited. The French people will have to devote enormous resources to supporting such a state since it would not be able to sustain itself financially at the same level as the rest of France. Muslims are only a fraction as productive as White Christians. Even lazy White Christians like the French.

Andy
Andy
6 years ago

I think it is a good idea. Its even better then the Ghettos they have now. Concentrate the Muslim in one place, put some wire around them, and then tell them its their state. lol
Let the rockets fly!

gaffer
gaffer
6 years ago

Bring it on

c_arnold
6 years ago

The French tried that once. I think they call it Algeria now.

White Guy
White Guy
6 years ago

Are there any examples of creating a ‘state’ within a state, that are functional? Hmmm, let me think, Indian Reservations, um nope, Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore, ohhhh…

ACThinker
ACThinker
6 years ago

A similar idea was tried with the Visagoths and I think some of the other germanic tribes in the late Roman period (post AD350)…. it doesn’t work out well. Instead of ‘civil war’ where you have two forces fighting to control the government and thus land. You end up with a regular war with two forces trying to control the land and be the government…..