Canadian Judge Recognizes Three Polyamorous Lovers As Parents

So now a child can have an unlimited number of parents, at the whim of the people who claim “parentage”:

A Canadian court has recognized three unmarried adults as the legal parents of a child born within their “polyamorous” family.

The Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court declared two men in a polyamorous relationship with a woman a the legal parents of the child in the first case of its kind in the country’s history.

RT reports: Canadian law recognizes polyamorous relationships, but bars bigamy and polygamy, in which the same person is involved in several marriages.

“Society is continuously changing and family structures are changing along with it,” Justice Robert Fowler wrote in his decision. “This must be recognized as a reality and not as a detriment to the best interests of the child.”

He mentions “best interest of the child” because historically that was always the legal precedent. It is why if you find out your wife was sleeping with the bum down the street and divorce her, the law will make you pay for child support, even though the child is not your’s and you can prove it with a DNA test. Your interests don’t matter. The best interests of the child are that you pay to raise it, so you pay even though it is not your’s.

Notice that with the left that precedent doesn’t apply if it involves sexual degeneracy. That is why those studies showing that on the whole, children in gay families fare worse than children in straight families, are so dangerous. The legal judgments regarding it should only emphasize what is best for the child. Divorce could be similar, it no-fault were ever litigated based on studies showing outcomes for children of single moms were worse overall.

All of this is the breakdown in amygdala. At this point I feel like I am just documenting it for those who will study it in the Renaissance which will come after the Apocalypse.

I think deep down all of these people still have the deep brain pathways driving rearing urges, that want children raised well, and which would prefer a two-parent, heterosexual, nuclear family. But the aversive stimulus produced by the amygdala has grown weak due to the amygdala-atrophy of ease and safety, and this has produced the “tolerance” for things which naturally would be found abhorrent. I think it is that tolerance in the masses which is being exploited by relatively few rabbits (and perhaps the Cabal), rather than a broader shift in public preferences.

In a lot of ways, tolerance, and diminished amygdala-triggering at the thought of wrong is what satan uses to persuade, so it is not surprising to see the exact same mechanism on the left. Everybody knows right and wrong. It is the diminished amygdala of tolerance which allows one to subvert that natural understanding. Of course it comes back to the old adage about the only thing necessary for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing.

Tolerance is an evil word.

Our population’s amygdalae will come back all on their own. But it will require the Apocalypse, to exercise those amygdalae to make them strong – and to strengthen the morals they produce. Fortunately for us, the Apocalypse is still on its way.

Tell everyone about r/K Theory, because it is best for the child

This entry was posted in Amygdala, Decline, Homosexuality, Liberals, Morals, Psychology, r-stimuli, rabbitry, Rearing Differences, Sexual Deviance. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mr_Twister
Mr_Twister
5 years ago

Off topic AC

But did Trump just start applying a Pincer like pressure? The public half of the tongs.

Q/PizzaGate/Human Trafficking
“By the thousands”
https://youtu.be/YQIpMMKpGQI

Haven’t finished watching it yet, had to share it asap.

Yep
Yep
5 years ago

Would you say that amygdala aversion or revulsion you mention might be what people in the olden days would call conscience?