New Podcast On RFK Assassination Raises Questions

I’ve seen this talked about around online, and the timing seemed suspicious given Q has been talking about this:

It’s been fifty years since Robert F. Kennedy was shot and killed on June 6, 1968…

It’s now the subject of a new podcast, The RFK Tapes, from Cadence13 and the producers of Crimetown, Marc Smerling and Zac Stuart-Pontier…

Some witnesses say they saw a woman wearing a polka-dot dress standing next to Sirhan right before the shooting… The woman’s identity has never been discovered…

Despite the fact that Sirhan’s gun could only fire eight bullets, new audio analysis and photographs taken by LAPD officers at the scene suggest that more shots were fired.

Wooden door frames that were booked into police evidence could possibly have helped answer the question of how many bullets were fired. But when those questions were raised six years later, police admitted that they had destroyed the door frames in June 1969, claiming they lacked storage space to keep them.

Not surprising given Derren Brown’s actually producing a mind-controlled shooter using hypnosis alone, and replicating every facet of Sirhan’s allegations.

The Podcast is pretty interesting, especially in conjunction with Derren Brown’s work, and especially in light of the mind blowing information which you would think the media would have reported, given how shocking it is. It turns out Sirhan’s lawyer hired a hypnotist who unraveled Sirhan’s programming, and who discovered Sirhan would go into a shooting mode if his elbow was pinched – something Sirhan recalled under hypnosis that the lady in the polkadot dress had done to him right before he started shooting. I never heard that allegation, nor did the media replay the audio of George Plimpton, who held Sirhan down after the shooting, and reported Sirhan’s eyes were “enormously peaceful” as he was being held down immediately after the shooting. And that ignores the physical evidence that there were two guns involved. Robert Kennedy even spent the night before the California Primary with the director of the Manchurian candidate, John Frankenheimer, who was a good friend, supposedly.

The other interesting aspect is to listen to Sirhan’s account of the events leading up to the shooting. He just happens to run into people at the range who invite him on a spur of the moment to the Kennedy event, where he would do the shooting. When he shows up, the Bartender looks familiar though he can’t place him, and immediately makes him a drink which hits him super hard (and which was probably drugged). He encounters the very pretty girl in the Polka Dot dress, who immediately starts flirting with him. A waiter says she was holding on to Sirhan as she led him around to the kitchen. And all of them evaporate after the event, none ever come forward, and we have no idea who any of them are.

Ten years ago, the logistics involved in this would have been the hardest part of this for me to swallow. Now I realize, if you know what is out there, this is actually evidence Sirhan is telling the truth. When he describes this elaborate control of his environment, with people in on the ruse drifting in and out of his sphere seemingly randomly but at the perfect times, and at times occupying the space around him almost completely, he is describing a machine that exists and is designed for exactly such a purpose but that nobody knows exists. I am sure he feels as if he is destroying his own credibility with the story. But he continues to tell the story because he believes it is the truth. When somebody purposely says something which they think is unbelievable, and you know it is consistent with an unknown reality they would have no clue of, you realize they are telling the truth, because a liar would make up a lie that is believable.

An extremely interesting aspect of the whole piece is to listen to the media reports of the time. Strait-laced, authoritarian voices explaining the script to a gullible public which would believe anything they said, because they had no other input of information to countermand what they were told. A random nutjob shot the President. He acted alone. Yes, the doors of the kitchen that had bullet holes were destroyed, and the shooter claims he was hypnotized and can’t remember, and a hypnotist said he was more hypnotiziable than the over 6000 other people he has hypnotized, and there were probably more bullet holes than the nutjob fired in the kitchen, and people saw other people who were involved but those other people have disappeared and will not come forward. But none of that matters, because the news says it was a lone shooter.

Another interesting aspect is, if they killed RFK, they killed JFK. And if they killed RFK and JFK, they probably killed JFK Jr. too. And if they killed JFK, RFK, and JFK Jr, they probably killed a lot of other people in the intervening years. From Martin Luther King and Malcolm X to Andrew Breitbart and Antonin Scalia, and all sorts of people in between, both time-wise and ideologically. You don’t give a person who would use this power, this ability to act completely without consequence, and not see the bodies pile up.

But perhaps the most interesting aspect is what we do not yet know. Who are the people of the machine? To what are their allegiances sworn? How much are they read in on the objectives of their missions? Have they been false flagged into serving some shadowy Cabal, thinking it is in the name of America? Did they show up at a therapist one day complaining of depression, agree to be hypnotized to boost their mood, and end up zombie foot soldiers in an unwitting army?

Our only hope of true revelation at this point is Donald J Trump, and the loyal Americans of the military and intelligence. Pray they succeed, because if they do not, it is all over.

Tell everyone about r/K Theory, because truth is stranger than fiction

This entry was posted in Cabal Inc., Conspiracy, Intel, Politics, Q, Trump. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jack
Jack
5 years ago

First the Washington Post gives favorable (front page) coverage to the notion of a conspiracy in this case, and now People magazine. Something is up. What’s more, it’s not just that they’re admitting the possibility of a conspiracy, but of a mind-controlled assassin. These allegations have been around since the 1970s, when William Turner identified a hypnotist named William Joseph Bryan as possibly being Sirhan’s programmer. But even though the coroner’s report leaves little doubt that Sirhan couldn’t have fired the fatal shot, the media has NEVER touched this case, even during all the interest in the JFK case in the 90s because of the Oliver Stone’s film.

But now they’re poised to admit it, and to admit the existence of hypno-programmed assassins? It’s obviously a coordinated campaign if WaPo and People are both reporting on it. But why, and why now?

Bob Sykes
Bob Sykes
5 years ago

What we need now is a Pinochet style coup d’etat. But is it possible? Are the flag officers so corrupt, so coopted that they will support the Deep State against Trump? Apres Trump le deluge.

English Tom
English Tom
5 years ago

A.C.

Re: elaborate control of his environment.

The Robert Redford movie: The Sting shows elements of this type of planning/execution as the conmen attempt to fleece a rich criminal. Certainly worth a watch. Darren Brown is also very accessible for those looking into human Influence and control.

Sam J.
Sam J.
5 years ago

I wish I could remember where but it was a long time ago I saw a documentary where a witness said that she saw a girl in a Polka Dot dress come running out saying something like,”We shot him” or something to that effect. It was someone at the rally, speech or whatever that saw her.

I’m sure JFK Jr was killed. He had a media platform with the magazine “George”. I think it was doing ok. I read a few issues. How long before he could resist talking about the Kennedy assassination? He had to have looked into it enough to know it was an inside job. What kills me is that people still argue whether it was an inside job or not. The House committee that reexamined the evidence concluded there was more than one shooter from the open mics of the police and timing the shots. The speed of sound is fixed and they proved without any doubt that there was more than one shooter by simply measuring the echo and timing of the sounds from the different shots. Same with building 7 on 9-11. It fell the same speed as a rock dropped in air. Since gravity is exactly the same on rocks dropped in air and buildings and the building fell the same speed as a rock dropped in air then the building could have ONLY been supported by air. Well we know the building wasn’t floating in the air and the fires at base of the building didn’t boil away the structure til it was as dense as air. That only leaves some sort of demo that took out all support for at a minimum over eleven floors.

Trump knows about the inside job on 9-11. There’s an interview where he says that there was a bomb in the building. He said after the first bombing, (the FBI filmed the first bomb being mixed before it was driven into the WTC in 1993), Trump got his structural engineer to show him the 1993 blast and the strength of the WTC building. Trump said that there was no way just a plane could have done this. He was on tape saying this. After I wrote this I looked it up here it is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt-ldMj9y9w

One thing I think Trump is wrong about, and others, is that the planes could not go through the steel because they were aluminum. If anything, anything, is going fast enough it will blast through anything else. They have shot plastic pellets from railguns at tremendous speeds and it goes through aluminum. Also the video above says Boeing has a remote control system on the plane. True but the people who make the boxes that control this is an Israeli company. They are on all the major planes that I know of and the Jews control them.

Jack
Jack
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
5 years ago

One of the earliest journalists to investigate the RFK shooting was Ted Charach. He made a documentary called The Second Gun back in the early 70s. It has an interview with the high school kid you are talking about, whose name escapes me just now as I haven’t seen the film in ages.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjOjsOKS4gs

lordofthehundreds
5 years ago

Always note that every good thought that helps unravel this mystery–and you’ve asked some very good ones tonight–brings us that much closer to the truth.

Even if the GE resigned tonight to enjoy Florida, all of what has been uncovered over the last nine months through Q and fine people like yourself never goes away. It gets added to all the other good thoughts uncovered by JFK researchers, RFK conspiracy historians, and those seeking the Octopus, the Black Eagle Trust, Venice histories, Great Power intelligence campaigns, Bildeberger transcripts, Gen. Smedley Butler, J.P Morgan and N. Tesla, the Clinton death list, anti-gravity research, and the rest of the secret world that we know exists but do not yet see its entire picture.

This information will gets shared and analyzed over the next few years, only because Q and what we’ve been allowed to see has never happened before. Research into this never stops, and has not stopped since Garrett’s “The Revolution Was” explained what really happened in the New Deal.

BTW, great analysis of the mass communication situation at the end of the 1960s. It did not significantly change until 1993-95, with BBSes, Prodigy, and Compuserve finally allowed this hidden information to be widely shared. 25 years later, now millions more know something isn’t right.

ERTZ
ERTZ
5 years ago

I thought about how to optimally blackmail people for political control.
It’s not only about how to control a politician for some time;
also a lot of agents/assassins/spies etc. have to be kept not only under control temporarily, but forever: This is difficult, because if they grow old, they may see things differently, and because they die soon anyway they could publicize their past actions – or do it posthumously.
It seems such problems for the “handlers”, the master controllers of such conspiracies, have caused them trouble in the past – some past agents suddenly found their conscience or felt a need to publicize their knowledge (or try to sell their secrets for money).
This is a grave threat to the stability and eternal secrecy of conspiracies.
It seems impractical to just kill all ex-agents as an easy solution for many reasons.
Smarter agents also can be expected to secretly record and store evidence of their past actions for their master handlers as insurance against them getting untimely accidents or deadly diseases.
What is needed is a powerful, time-stable (beyond the agent’s own death), grand threat to prevent “leaking” ex-agents.
What could fulfill this function?
I came up with a solution:
The credible threat of the master controllers in the event of betrayal not only to kill the ex-agent,
but to completely exterminate his whole extended family – over a long time – decades (for practical and public-scrutiny reasons): “We will not only kill you, but all your extended family, your children and their children’s children, and before that, perhaps we make their lives extremely miserable.”
This could not be easily defended against – even if one were extremely rich, it would necessitate full-spectrum body-guarding/personal protection/food control/etc. over decades – for probably dozens of people. This is a completely unrealistic protection requirement even for those most privileged.
The practical problem for this extortion is credibility/believability of the threat; the target must believe that the blackmail arrives from a conspiracy that has the will and means to do something like that, even done to one or two dozens of people over potentially more than half a century.
But if that credibility can be conveyed, it should produce extraordinary extortion compliance.

Maybe the Kennedy family is an example for that technique – over decades, a lot of their members met with bad luck, a suspiciously high assassination and deadly accident rate.

ERTZ
ERTZ
Reply to  ERTZ
5 years ago

To add a vivid example of my theory:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_curse

Goose
Goose
5 years ago

RE: JFK Jr. Investigate a little further. His plane was fully equipped for instrument only flight. It was kept in top condition because of who he was and FAA requirements.. He was not qualified for IFR (instrument flight rules). More than one of the pilots who were qualified at Teterboro that night offered to accompany him on the flight (my personal knowledge). This can be verified. As conditions deteriorated at his intended destination he was asked to redirect and land he refused.

So, why did he not stop and spend the night and resume in the AM when conditions had cleared. I was at sea in the general vicinity in the AM so I know that conditions cleared as forecasted. There were plenty of people around him who watched quietly for his safety. He could have been taught (and maybe was) how to turn on the auto pilot and set it to straight and level and let ground control guide him to a spot that had visual flight ruled in effect and let him land.

Many questions but overall general aviation is dangerous.
Goose

Veritas Quaerite
Veritas Quaerite
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
5 years ago

As a licensed private pilot, I can tell you with great certainty that VFR flight into IMC is a killer. Even if he stayed clear of IMC as he flew over the water, the conditions that night were like flying into a black hole with few of the visual references that allow for safe VFR flight. He was a relatively low-hours pilot, and more than one flight instructor commented negatively on his skills. Even if he “just” encountered a small patch of IMC … watch this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7t4IR-3mSo

BTW – I have encountered all those sensations in flight where I was wearing a “blinder” where I could only see the instruments with a flight instructor in the right seat. He had me look down for 10-15 seconds while he banked the plane and then leveled it. Once I took the controls in less than 60 seconds the plane was already in what is called an “unusual attitude”. That was with *all* my instruments functional and me knowing exactly what was happening. My brain literally did not want to believe the instruments. It takes *lots* of practice to ignore those feelings.

I totally believe that both JFK and RFK were political assassinations – but after reading several analysis of the JFK Jr. crash, along with radar returns and position reports – he dug his own grave when he made the decision to fly that night. He was not competent to make that flight on his own.

English Tom
English Tom
5 years ago

Check out a hypnotist called Louis Jolyon West. Just look at some of the things he has been involved with. Also check out George Estabrooks on creating an assassin via hypnosis. Get the book: Secret don’t Tell by Carla Emery which is an encyclopaedia on hypnosis and especially its unethical dimension.