LL remains AG HRC.
HRC appoints new AS replacement.
RBG steps down.
LL steps up.
To be clear, LL was promised the Supreme Court position of RBG.
RBG big problems.
LL is Loretta Lynch, Obama’s AG, or Attorney General. HRC is Hillary. AS is Antonin Scalia. RBG is Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Clinton being at the same place and time as Lynch was probably planned then, which fits with intel operations. Lynch was under full coverage and being monitored, maybe even by assets working as her staff, and Clinton was deployed to do this, on a planned mission to run into her by chance.
When you get familiar with how things work, you realize things which seem to happen by chance to major players rarely do happen by chance, because everyone is being clocked 24/7, and much of your day’s events end up being planned just because it is easier that way. When Scalia happened by chance to bump into an old friend in the airport on his way home to DC, and was invited to Cibolo ranch on the spur of the moment, it set off alarm bells in my head. I’d say it is 80-90% that dude set him up. If Scalia was my loved one, I would have to give serious thought to grabbing that guy up and having a long talk with him in an isolated place.
If this was a planned operation, and the white hats were up on the black hats, then the white hats knew the game plan ahead of time, which would jibe with Q claiming they had bugged the conversation and tipped off the media.
It makes for good comedy. The black hats think they are the top shit, covering Lynch completely, manipulating all these events to put Clinton and Lynch together and offering the deal that cannot be refused to control the US government. But in the shadows behind them are the white hats, deploying their own surveillance on the black hat’s surveillance, bugging the rooms where the black hats listen to their bugs, listening to all their planning and orders, and just getting one up on them. I’d imagine it is tougher to feel like more of a dick than to be doing all this tip of the spear shit from deep in the shadows, only to find out later another intel op was one up you this thoroughly all along, and played you completely.
But back to RBG. What could those “big problems” be?
Q linked to this pdf, detailing Ginsburg’s policy positions, among which are:
1. The age of consent for sexual acts must be lowered to 12 years old.
“Eliminate the phrase ‘carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife, who has not attained the age of 16 years’ and substitute a federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense… A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, . . . [and] the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old.” (p. 102)…
Prostitution must be legalized: it is not sufficient to change the law to sex-neutral language.
“Prostitution proscriptions are subject to several constitutional and policy objections. Prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (p. 97) “Retaining prostitution business as a crime in a criminal code is open to debate. Reliable studies indicate that prostitution is not a major factor in the spread of venereal disease, and that prostitution plays a small and declining role in organized crime operations.” (p. 99)
“Current provisions dealing with statutory rape, rape, and prostitution are discriminatory on their face… There is a growing national movement recommending unqualified decriminalization [of prostitution] as sound policy, implementing equal rights and individual privacy principles.” (pp. 215-216)
4. The Mann Act must be repealed; women should not be protected from “bad” men.
“The Mann Act . . . prohibits the transportation of women and girls for prostitution, debauchery, or any other immoral purpose. The act poses the invasion of privacy issue in an acute form. The Mann Act also is offensive because of the image of women it perpetuates. . . . It was meant to protect from xthe villainous interstate and international traffic in women and girls,’ *those women and girls who, if given a fair chance, would, in all human probability, have been good wives and mothers and useful citizens. . . . The act was meant to protect weak women from bad men.” (pp. 98-99)
You don’t just begin by chance happening to intellectually seek to turn back every law that makes sex trafficking of children illegal. You begin thinking sex trafficking of children is a good thing you want legalized, (or you are told to defend it) and you then construct arguments for why each aspect of it is morally right, and should not be illegal.
Ginsburg’s problem may be she was a part of something which she now wants to legalize and make moral in her own mind for her own sanity. Or she has evidence out there that her positions were dictated to her by some conspiracy.
That may be the reason the Cabal had her placed on the Supreme Court in the first place. I would assume if Loretta Lynch was offered Ginsburg’s seat, it was offered because whatever is in RBG’s background was so bad it left Hillary with no doubt she could force her out. It would jibe with how influential people fought to get her placed in powerful positions from the beginning of her career:
In 1960, despite a strong recommendation from Albert Martin Sacks, who was a professor and later dean of Harvard Law School, Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter rejected Ginsburg for a clerkship position due to her gender. Columbia Law Professor Gerald Gunther also pushed for Judge Edmund L. Palmieri of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York to hire Ginsburg as a law clerk, threatening to never recommend another Columbia student to Palmieri if he did not give Ginsburg the opportunity and guaranteeing to provide the judge with a replacement clerk should Ginsburg not succeed. Later that year, Ginsburg began her clerkship for Judge Palmieri, a position she held for two years.
That is what I would expect to see, as a nascent Cabal began using existing agents in the government for filling the governmental hierarchy with its newly minted members.
The question is, is there something in her background which could be used for blackmail that made the Cabal select her, and if so, how did Hillary pick up on it so she could rest assured Ginsburg would step down when asked.
Of course there is another possibility. Antonin Scalia had told Judge Andrew Napolitano that he had seen surveillance tracking members of the Supreme Court before he died, and he assumed it had come from Obama.
In the TV show Burn Notice, Michael Westin noted that there are two types of surveillance. The kind which is designed to find things out, and the type which is designed to be a pain in the ass and intimidate you. The first is regular deep-cover surveillance done with an eye to never being seen or burned. The later is often referred to as decoy/diversion surveillance or harassment surveillance. You never see the former, but the later makes it a point to be noticed, and irritate/initmidate, which would indicate to me Scalia was getting the later version. And he was probably talking with the other Justices, who probably reported the same thing, since Scalia said he thought the entire Court was under coverage.
Now picture you are a 65lb 84 year old female that has trouble staying awake through a State of the Union address, who is being followed by an intimidating cadre of government spooks who structure coverage to appear as if there are thousands of them everywhere, and they need obey no laws. Then imagine when Hillary of all people, suddenly tells you it is time to step down. And your best friend, a fellow Supreme Court Justice who was a fearless man’s man, just got his ticket punched blatantly with no consequences to the killers.
If you want to live, you step down, and fast.
Lots going on in this world, and nothing is as it seemed.
Tell others about r/K Theory, because it is a dangerous world out there, no matter who you are