r-strategists, Low Rearing Urge, and Preemptive-Appeasement

Sure, kill my child, I won’t hold it against you:

The family of a murdered British backpacker are hoping authorities will “show leniency” when sentencing them for their horrific crimes.

Despite losing their son David Miller, 24, who was killed alongside Hannah Witheridge, 23, the family are hoping the killers will receive a long jail sentence to reflect on their crimes as opposed to the death sentence.

The young backpackers were killed in a savage attack in September 2014 while walking back to their hotel along a beach in Koh Tao…

David Miller, from Jersey, and Hannah Witheridge, of Norwich, were battered with a wooden hoe as they walked back to their rooms.

Hannah was raped during the ordeal in September 2014.

It makes no sense logically. They raped and killed an innocent girl. They murdered your son. Just let the government flip the switch.

This only makes sense as an instinctual program in the brain similar to the programming if an r-strategist rabbit. It deemphasizes the importance of offspring, and imbues a drive to ingratiate themselves with the locals in foreign lands.

A human rabbit, following such a strategy will lose a few offspring, but they will survive in their new homeland of free resources by avoiding conflict. And if they were mating as fast as rabbits are programmed to mate, and there was no birth control or abortion, they could easily make up the deficit.

The r-strategy is about quantity over quality. Love and the drive to protect is not a part of the equation.

Tell everyone about r/K Theory, because rabbits are disposable, even to rabbits

This entry was posted in Liberals, Politics, Psychology, r-stimuli, rabbitry, Rearing Differences. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
7 years ago

[…] r-strategists, Low Rearing Urge, and Preemptive-Appeasement […]

Pitcrew
Pitcrew
7 years ago

Its just like Rotherham. If Rotherham had happened in America only God himself could save the perps. Fed up cops would be disappearing mooz in the middle of the night- by the truckload.

Anonymous
Anonymous
7 years ago

Hello,

I’ve been trying to contact you, but your email address seems to not be valid

I was recently turned on to your website by a friend, and I’ve found it fascinating. I agree very much that is does represent a possible paradigm shift in the way we discuss politics and policy motivations and is much more useable that they purely intellectual and logic based attempts of the past few centuries. Obviously this will only work if your work and theories enter into the popular consciousness. The book is obviously a major step, but (from what I have witnessed on the internet and in universities), your work is not well known at all. I think that you need to devise a new distribution strategy, specifically by making use of internet message boards (reddit, 4/chan, etc). I dont know you personal politics and feelings toward these places, but (as someone who has studied and works in information systems, and has a minor poly-sci background in school), I can tell you that this is the most effective way to reach people currently (as evidenced by the 2016 election). The truth is, if you are serious about getting this out there, you site and book aren’t going to cut it – you need more exposure. I have some connections to some moderators on these sites – but I strongly encourage you to reach out on your own. YouTube is also a great resource. There are a number of rapidly growing Conservative outlets that you could partner with (everyone benefits from views) – especially in some kind of multipart series. Please let me know if I can be of assistance in any way.

That said, I do have a few questions about your research.

1. r/K Theory seems to say that an environment with plentiful, easily exploitable resources favor large offspring count and low-investment parenting (r/Liberal), while hashers, lest bountiful environments favor lower number, more developed and parented offspring (K/Conservative). Yet, this seems to be the opposite in humans. People living in poorer regions or harsher times (Middle East, Sub-saharan Africa, Ireland during the famine, etc), tend to have large numbers of children (yet do tend to be more conservative), while very wealthy and abundant societies (present day US and Western Europe) seem to be having very few children, if any. This doesn’t seem to contradict your theory, as the main correlations seem to remain (Plentiful, seemingly limitless amounts of wealth and resources breed Liberal policies, and greater grasp of the harsh realities of the planet and resource availability, Conservative ones), but human breeding habits seems to be in stark contrast to all other animals. I wonder if you have a biological reason for this, or if it is social/cultural (e.g. Humans are the only species in which the younger generation will feel an obligation to care for the older when it can no longer provide for itself – so many children is a kind of insurance in harsh times, etc)?

2. You mentioned how in r-selective groups, females tend to take on more masculine traits, and males feminine ones. As seen in large swaths of Western Left-leaning societies (Woman taking on male dress and style, and seeking out more masculine positions; men being more effeminate and subservient). This seems to be peaking in the whole “transgender” movement and claims to be “non-binary” etc. In light of that, if r-selection highly favors non-competition, does that mean that the “end goal” of an r-selected species would essentially be hermaphrodism, where each organism can have large numbers of offspring on its own, and exploit resources without even having to compete for a mate? (This would seem to explain the massive normalization of “gender as choice” occurring on the Left”).

I hope this reaches you in its entirety.

Hawkeye
Hawkeye
7 years ago

The pictures of these two appeared on the internet; her injuries were truly horrific. Were I the parents, far from letting the government flip the switch, I’d be enthusiastically inquiring about whether I could flip it for them.

180degreesout
7 years ago

I (insert sentence enhancer here) dodged a bullet!

Since birth in ’70 I’ve watched 3 branches of my extended family repeat r cycles to collapse!

It’s clockwork.

(I see a “sawtooth” wave cycling)

Derek
Derek
7 years ago

If the parents thought that a lifetime in prison was a worse sentence than death, I could understand it.

That’s not what they’re after, though.

Michael Kumpmann
Michael Kumpmann
7 years ago

“Quantity over Quality”

Did you know that this is exactly how Rene Guenon summarized any kind of civilisational decline?

dirkhblog
7 years ago

If you kill them they just get reincarnated earlier. Keep’em in a cage til they die of old age I say.