American Thinker touches on the obvious:
So when Obama says we should accept 200,000 “refugees,” what that really means (as if 200,000 isn’t awful enough) is that we are accepting as many as 1,600,000 invaders. If you factor in the high likelihood that many of these families will continue to have children once they’re here, the number easily reaches 2 million.
Two million (more) Muslims, few of whom speak English, many of whom are uneducated, a large number of whom are unemployable or who won’t want to work, many if not most of whom will never integrate into our culture, the majority of whom will come “clinging to their religion” (to use a misdirected phrase in the proper context), and Lord knows how many of whom will inflict harm.
Why are we doing this? Oh, yes. I forgot. The fundamental transformation of America.
Who could oppose reuniting families?
The upside is they will establish ghettos around the cities, and prey on the rabbits preferentially. The downside is a lot of innocent loyal Americans who don’t deserve to die will get raped, beaten, robbed, and killed as well. And eventually we will have to deal with the cancer.
Trump is the only one who may have the balls to shut the whole thing down, and even he might be taking on more than he can handle.
Go Trump.
[…] By Anonymous Conservative […]
Who could oppose the reuniting of families? Immigration services, if your a naturalized US citizen, from Canada, living in New Hampshire….. This what Mark Steyn said while guest hosting the Rush Limbaugh show a few weeks back.
His story is that he’d had his green card or citizen ship (I forget which) and his daughter- a minor- was going to be deported. No concern that her father was here, etc. So he calls [male cow excrement] (I honestly don’t remember the term he used) on the whole idea of not separating families. It makes good publicity, but is far from the reality.
[…] America Will Import 2 Million Syrian Refugees? | […]