Surveillance Comments

These are comments people have posted to my site, after reading my surveillance pieces, and then performing the statistical analyses of how much traffic they see in long straight roads, vs what they see at intersections and decision points.

Note the phenomenon is global, and likely represents some sort of global conspiracy. It is not unique to America, though I suspect you will see more of it in the US than many other places:

__________________________________________________________

AC I finally saw the neighborhood field surveillance teams!

Earlier this week I was out with a couple of my junior engineers doing preliminary field reconnaissance for a Corps of Engineers project on the Texas gulf coast. (Miles of seawall)

We were in a neighborhood approximately 1/2 mile from the bay, We all had our safety gear on and one of us had a survey rod, another had a camera and a white board, we are looking around taking pictures of culverts and channels etc. Neighborhood has really big lots, houses are really spread out (figure 1/4 acre) in lower economic class.

We weren’t parked more than 2 minutes than all of the sudden at the intersection east of us (about 50 yds) it turns into a parade. We couldn’t hardly talk to each other because of the amount of road noise, in a residential neighborhood! I would say in a 2 minute span there was 15 cars/motorcycles that traveled by us.

I just started laughing and said to one of my young’ins wow it’s like a parade! The engineer replied maybe it’s the neighborhood watch got word that we were in the neighborhood! Very blue pilled and we all had a laugh but wow you weren’t kidding on spooling up the assets when something ‘strange’ shows up in their area.

But it was your teaching that made me realize what was going on, no a single one of the slowed down and looked at us, even though we were stomping around with equipment and a camera with hi-viz vests. Everywhere else we stopped on that day people would look at us or stop and ask questions about what we were working on.

My guess is they must run things through that area after it comes from the coast and through a wildlife management area…

Fascinating to say the least.

Because I ride a motorcycle I’m always looking at bikes, and I have noticed that quite often I had the same motorcycle pass me twice in less than a 10 minute period in my travels. They must be easier to ‘deploy’.

News Briefs – 10/01/2020 at 6:18 pm_

______________________________________

 

I’ve read AC’s stuff on surveillance including showing it through Google Streetview. But I live in suburban Melbourne Australia and have never seen it here (I do a lot of cycling, especially at the moment with the way our Dictator Daniel Andrews has us in lockdown). I like simple hypotheses to test so this morning I decided to try and prove AC wrong in my allotted 2 hours of exercise.

One of the great things about cycling is that you’re in touch with the environment around you in a way that is difficult in a car – you don’t have the background noise of an engine when moving, you’re not travelling as fast, you can sit up and look around easily. All of your senses can work unhindered. It’s one of the things I’ve always liked about cycling but also lends itself to this sort of observation. Cars going as slowly as a bicycle will stand out easily and there’s all sorts of tricks you can use to justify going slowly or stopping, forcing cars to overtake you etc.

The method I used was to try and stick to back streets as much as possible (to avoid the normal traffic that is always there on main roads) and at every intersection or decision point where I could choose from multiple directions I’d record if there was someone in a position to observe that decision. In particular I was looking for people walking/jogging close to the intersection and cars. Note that I ignored streets that were dead-ends when counting the intersections – a lot of the housing estates I rode through had heaps of short courts that didn’t seem necessary to monitor since they didn’t lead anywhere. I took a pretty cruisy pace – usually only 15km/h so I could focus on my surroundings.

I rode a total of 38km and counted 208 decision points. Of those 208, I was able to detect there was someone who could observe my choice at 144 of them (69%). It was a Sunday morning so a lot of people are out walking/mowing the lawn etc and on its own this number doesn’t prove/disprove anything. I also probably made a few mistakes as I was keeping track in my head.

The thing that got me (and I noticed VERY quickly) was how few people I observed walking were on the long stretches between intersections – it appeared that almost everyone was walking within a short distance of intersections that were a decision point. I began to focus more on riding along streets that weren’t feeder streets to observe what was happening and it became quite clear that the location of people walking was strongly biased to within a short distance of intersections that were decision points.

I also observed a lot of cars exiting their driveways as I came along. Nothing out of the ordinary here… but possibly because that’s what I’ve always seen and it appears normal, even if statistically abnormal! One time I tried a mini experiment when I noticed a path running between two streets. I went down the path but stopped at a point where there was only one house that could observe my location and then sat there for about 2 minutes. No cars went down either street during that time. I then took a bet with myself what was the chance that there would be a car pulling out of a driveway/starting up as I came onto the street. Sure enough, someone backed out of their driveway as I pulled onto that street. Proves nothing on its own, but adds to my suspicions!

Another time I had a car coming behind me as I approached a T intersection. I pulled over so they would have to go first. They turned right and I slowly followed them, but stopped on the side of the road. They came to a halt in the middle of the road about 150-200m down the road and sat there for about half a minute. It was getting weird as they hadn’t even pulled to the side – just stopped in the middle of the road with no plausible reason. Eventually a car in the house they were stopped in front of started backing out and as it came in site, they left. Over the next little while I felt like this scene from The Truman Show https://youtu.be/z9lBvg5clr0?t=55 with cars coming from everywhere. I’m only talking about 5 cars or so, but it seemed way out of proportion! In addition, a couple of ladies came along delivering junk mail and stood at the corner across the road from me for a minute or so discussion where to go next. They had came along the street I’d just come from and I didn’t notice them. I wish I had a video camera to go back and see if I had passed them earlier!

In the 5 minutes or so I sat at that spot, I saw about 4 cars pull into or out of houses in one short section (where that first car stopped in the middle of the road). It really makes we wonder if there’s something special about that location!

It would be really interesting to do a statistical analysis of where people are walking. When you regularly go along back streets that are 500-800m long and don’t see anyone walking along the sections away from the end intersections (or only rarely) and then consistently find people within 20-50m of the intersection, you have to wonder what the odds of it are as I’m pretty sure it’s way outside what you’d expect to see!

I’m probably doomed to always notice this now – thanks AC!

News Briefs – 10/03/2020 at 10:14 pm

*****

Nice timing to get this post and as always so much to learn and thanks for the shout-out! As always, thanks for what you teach us!

I ran another experiment a few days ago on almost the same route as I did the previous time here in Melbourne. But I picked a cold miserable morning with drizzle to minimise the background noise. It worked with very few people out.

This time I used a slightly different methodology. I counted the pedestrians I saw within 10-25m of an intersection and the pedestrians who were further away then that. I also tried to keep a rough estimate of how many were a long distance from any intersection. Because my aim is to disprove AC’s hypothesis (I still don’t want to believe any of this) I also tried to bias it by slowing down at each intersection and looking along every side street as far as possible to try and find extra numbers to count towards the second tally.

First off, the numbers. The ratio was incredibly consistent the entire time at 3 to 1 (near intersection vs away from intersection). Final result was 102-32. There were probably only a maximum of10 people who didn’t have at least some sort of view of an intersection. In fact, I can count on one hand the people who were truly a significant distance from an intersection (in a location that seemed to have zero surveillance value). This is on a ride of 32km (plus the couple of hundred metres of each side street I looked up).

Initially I thought I should count anyone within about 25m (maybe even 50m) of an intersection but a massive number of them were within about 5m! it’s crazy how many were so close. To be fair, on streets where there are cross streets you can’t get much more than 25m from an intersection so it’s difficult to cater for that bias, so I did start trying to ride up and down those longer minor roads that ran off them wherever possible.

Although I wasn’t counting people who were on their properties (I just focused on those out walking), I did notice that the majority of people outside doing yard work etc were very close to intersections.

I also went back to the spot where there was a crazy amount of traffic last time and this time it was dead. Almost no cars, no pedestrians. I didn’t see anyone until I got to the corner where I’d stopped last time and there was a man standing on his porch just staring at me.

Someone made a suggestion a few days ago to get a 360 degree camera. I love that idea – would be fascinating to use it to do a deeper analysis and try and work out the stats around the chance of encountering so many people so close to intersections (not that my statistical capabilities are that good!). One of the flaws I see in my methodology is that people who live on low traffic side streets will tend to spend a fair proportion of their time walking on larger feeder streets. A Strava heatmap would be interesting to use in this analysis.

For those who may not have seen it, here’s my original comment and the replies: https://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/news-briefs-10-03-2020/#comment-349663

Surveillance Detection – The Professional Course Of Real Life Experience Part Eight, Sri Lankan Motorbike Surveillance – 2020/10/11 at 5:22 am

___________________________________

Hi AC,

I have been reading your blog since late 2018. I wanted to comment on your post where a Vox Day commenter was trying to down play your observations on cabal and their spying/monitoring network. This last spring, I was reading the blog and you had a post going into some detail about how the cabal monitoring works as far as low level intel gatherers. I had never talked about your site to my wife before but after reading that post I mentioned it to her explaining what you had said. We regularly go for an evening walk on a bike path that parallels the main road into our neighborhood. On that evening as we started walking to the west a small Cessna airplane began flying a pattern. They’d fly toward the road, turn parallel to the road, then fly some distance to the northwest then west and loop back. Every time on the return leg, the plane reached the road at the point adjacent where we were on the bike path. This continued for several miles until we reached the end of the path. Normally we stop there and admire the sun setting behind the mountains. When we stopped this time the plane no longer continued moving to the west but looped so that when it reached the road it was consistently across from where we were standing. Then as we started back home the plane now flew the pattern to the east, again reaching the road at the point where we were walking. Finally, I said let’s stop and see what happens. We stood there for a good 10 minutes and the plane stayed in a pattern to always reach the road where we were standing. When we started walking again, the plane again tracked us until we reached the road to our house at which point it flew away. That experience made me a believer in what you say. I think the reason they did what they did is exactly what you’ve said many times. They do it because they can. Because they get bored and because they like to mess with people. I’m not important to any one in any way so it’s not about that. It’s because, as you’ve said, they can do it so they do it for whatever reason. In this particular instance I think they happened to be monitoring our home, heard what I said, and decided to have some fun. For context we’ve lived here for several years. I have never before or since seen any planes flying patterns around here. I’m outdoors a lot because I enjoy being outside, so I know I would have noticed if flying patterns around here was a regular occurrence.

News Briefs – 10/03/2020  at 7:37 pm

____________________________________________

Thank you for another lesson on detecting surveillance. I just got back from a couple weeks off-grid with no electricity or even cell phone coverage. Noticed two things. First, I was walking across a friends field with him and his children. It was night. It is in an area that shouldn’t have much air traffic, if any. I saw some lights moving in the sky. I pointed up and asked him, “Is that normal? Do you have an airport near here?” He said no. Just then the plane turned, and flew directly over our heads and out of sight.

Second thing. For most of my life I’ve had difficulty sleeping. I sleep like a log, and get a full eight hours when I do finally sleep, but going to sleep at a sane hour just wasn’t possible.

A couple years ago I went to a tropical country to do a contract gig. Within one week my eyes started popping open at 7am sharp. No more sleeping until noon. I felt refreshed, I wanted to get up, there was no force involved. I hadn’t changed any of my eating, alcohol, or internet/computer habits. I was in an area with lots of wifi and cell phone coverage. But I was sleeping in a concrete building. When I got back home the week after, within three days the sleep pattern reverted to normal.

I attributed the change in sleep to the sunshine and swimming in the ocean.

This past week the same thing happened, except I was sleeping on the hard ground in the cold interior of Canada. I was not in a concrete shelter, but I was out of range of most electrical and cell phone stuff. It was really refeshing to feel sleep when the sky got dark, and to have ones eyes pop open at 7am even when partying until midnight. And again, the same night I got home, I felt wired like I’d had a lot of coffee, and couldn’t sleep until the wee hours of the morning.

This doesn’t sound like the audio attack AC has been suffering from, not nearly as devastating. Is it an attack that has been going on since childhood, or is it just electro-sensitivity?

Between electro-sensitivity and narcissists wandering around like wolves in search of prey, it is good to have AC’s educational articles to distinguish them from actual coverage.

On a related note, when Vox recently quoted your article about the reality of Cabal, the comments section was gold. A lot of professionals reported a “glass ceiling” on earnings that starts at 6 figures. But then one commenter sounded like me; there are some of us who have a much lower ceiling. Much. Much lower. I was very close to the 6 figure ceiling when my narc came in and married me. Since she came along it plummeted. If I was earning 6 figures I could get a tremendous amount done, and I think they know it. Same thing for that commenter at Vox Day’s, and his brothers and cousins, intelligent inventor/engineer types, who couldn’t even hold down regular jobs, kept getting bounced.

Today I was scheduled for a job interview at a blue collar job, and within two hours there was a follow up email, the job interview, scheduled later in the week, was rescinded with no reason given. We are talking jobs close to minimum wage here. Last month I was at a local factory. As soon as I walked in to apply and they saw my face, they were excited, talking about fast tracking me into management. But after 3 days, fired, the reason given was something small and bogus, so obviously not the real reason.

Surveillance Detection – The Professional Course Of Real Life Experience Part Eight, Sri Lankan Motorbike Surveillance – 2020/10/14 at 7:40 pm