Cuckservatives Outed In Wikileaks, Taking Money From Hillary To Take Down Donald

Just amazing piece on the traitors who had taken over the party:

Every day the job of President-Elect seems to become more danger-filled for Donald Trump…

An email from John Podesta to Huma Abedin…

The email, sent in July of this year, describes how funds were being diverted from Clinton’s campaign to the Super PACS of Jeb Bush, Carly Fiorina, and John Kasich…

“He is on board, will retract the invitation to speak. Eyes only.”

This email was dated days before Speaker of the House Paul Ryan withdrew the invitation to Donald Trump to speak at an event in Wisconsin…

FEC reports shows that two large donations from PACS and private sources in early October went to John McCain right after he attacked Trump publicly criticized Trump…

Senator Lindsay Graham, another outspoken critic of Donald Trump and briefly candidate for President from July to December also it seems received help from the Clintons.

Politics is the ultimate r-environment. Money, sex, delicious food, lack of threat, insulation from every negative thing in the nation – it has it all. It is even an environment which favors social maneuvering over raw skill at some tangible service.

It is more surprising that a real K-strategist would emerge and utterly destroy every rabbit in the party, than it is that top Republicans were taking money from the Clinton crime syndicate in return for trying to install the most odious Clinton out there in the highest office in the land.

With both parties led by a unified, utterly corrupt cabal like this, is it any wonder the nation is heading for an Apocalypse?

Share r/K Theory, because the GOP Elites supported Hillary Clinton

This entry was posted in Conspiracy, Cuckservatives, GOPocalypse, K-stimuli, Politics, rabbitry, Trump. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Cuckservatives Outed In Wikileaks, Taking Money From Hillary To Take Down Donald

  1. Pingback: Cuckservatives Outed In Wikileaks, Taking Money From Hillary To Take Down Donald | Aus-Alt-Right

  2. Karl says:

    “Politics is the ultimate r-environment. Money, sex, delicious food, lack of threat, insulation from every negative thing in the nation – it has it all”

    Lack of threat? Are you kidding? Historically the chance of a president being murdered is much larger than that of an average citizen. And arguably the present political climate is more divisive than usual which suggests an increased likelihood of political violence.

  3. BB says:

    Unrelated but interesting:

    The Thermodynamics of Conservatives and Liberals
    The Biogeography of Political-Religious Affiliation
    Charles Brack, January, 2009
    http://neuropolitics.org/Def3.html

    I have to admit to being a bit perplexed as to the way r and K is used in parts of the article, such as:
    > Fourth, the average survival time of a founding population increases exponentially with r. r is the rate of population growth if resources are not an issue. That is, if there are no resource constraints, r is the growth rate of a population. A species with a high r improves its survivability dramatically. Essentially, a species that can rapidly convert the potential energy of an environment into reproduction will be successful, as long as the environment cooperates. Once the environment stops cooperating, time to bring in the liberals.
    and
    > When conservatives enter a habitat, they quickly divert its potential energy into reproduction, so there is a net increase in the human biomass. The liberals do a better job at maintaining human biomass in an equilibrium state with the environment, that is, they modulate reproduction up and down quickly to match the available energy.
    and
    > The ability for liberals to reduce birth rates and the energy required for reproduction extends existing habitat life and supports large, dense populations. The propensity for conservatives to seek out new habitats and make them suitable for reproduction relieves pressure on urban areas, and further, performs one of the major tasks in improving the survivability of a species: extending the total inhabited area.

    Linkage/attribution chain:
    http://neuropolitics.org/Def3.html
    https://www.spartareport.com/2016/11/thermodynamic-explanation-politics/
    http://classicalvalues.com/2016/12/two-ecologies/
    https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2016/12/14/tt-minus-6-weeks/#comment-76490

    • Neuropolitics is trying to look at conservatives and liberals, and couch them as r and K right now, saying conservatives are r-selected, and liberals are the ultra-superior K. THe problem is they can’t really link the base urges of r/K to their respective sides in their theory.

      That is a mistake, because I think you have to look at what the psychology evolved to do and why. Right now technology, like birth control and abortion, have rendered High IQ liberals actually maladapted to reproduction. As a result liberalism is not working as it evolved to do, and is not functioning as a reproductive strategy because liberals are not designed for this environment.

      It is like the experiment throwing mice in a large room, and giving them free food with no mortality. Pretty soon the mice are doing all sorts of weird shit because they just aren’t evolved for that, and you can’t really characterize a lot of the behaviors in terms of r or K.

  4. Phelps says:

    False document. That document number doesn’t appear in the Podesta dumps from Wikileaks.

  5. I searched for the document on Wikileaks also and could not find it.

Leave a Reply