New meta-analysis has emerged from a document published today by an independent researcher known as The Forensicator, which suggests that files eventually published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona were likely initially downloaded by a person with physical access to a computer connected to the internal DNC network. The individual most likely used a USB drive to copy the information. The groundbreaking new analysis irrevocably destroys the Russian hacking narrative, and calls the actions of Crowdstrike and the DNC into question…
Disobedient Media previously reported that Crowdstrike is the only group that has directly analyzed the DNC servers. Other groups including Threat Connect have used the information provided by Crowdstrike to claim that Russians hacked the DNC. However, their evaluation was based solely on information ultimately provided by Crowdstrike; this places the company in the unique position of being the only direct source of evidence that a hack occurred…
The document states that the files that eventually published as “NGP-VAN” by Guccifer 2.0 were first copied to a system located in the Eastern Time Zone, with this conclusion supported by the observation that “the .7z file times, after adjustment to East Coast time fall into the range of the file times in the .rar files.” This constitutes the first of a number of points of analysis which suggests that the information eventually published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona was not obtained by a Russian hacker.
The Forensicator stated in their analysis… one would simply plug a USB drive with the LinuxOS into a computer and reboot it; after restarting, the computer would boot from the USB drive and load Linux instead of its normal OS. A large amount of data would then be copied to this same USB drive.
In this case, additional files would have been copied en masse, to be “pruned” heavily at a later time when the 7zip archive now known as NGP-VAN was built. The Forensicator wrote that if 1.98 GB of data had been copied at a rate of 22.6 MB/s and time gaps t were noticed at the top level of the NGP-VAN 7zip file were attributed to additional file copying, then approximately 19.3 GB in total would have been copied. In this scenario, the 7zip archive (NGP-VAN) would represent only about 10% of the total amount of data that was collected.
The very small proportion of files eventually selected for use in the creation of the “NGP-VAN” files were later published by the creators of the Guccifer 2.0 persona. This point is especially significant, as it suggests the possibility that up to 90% of the information initially copied was never published.
The use of a USB drive would suggest that the person first accessing the data could not have been a Russian hacker. In this case, the person who copied the files must have physically interacted with a computer that had access to what Guccifer 2.0 called the DNC files…
Both the most likely explanation and the less likely scenario provided by The Forensicator’s analysis virtually exclude the possibility of a Russian or remote hacker gaining external access to the files later published as “NGP-VAN.” In both cases, the physical presence of a person accessing a containing DNC information would be required…
Despite Guccifer 2.0’s conflicting reports of having both been a Russian hacker and having contact with Seth Rich, the work of The Forensicator indicates that neither of these scenarios is likely true. What is suggested is that the files now known as “NGP-VAN” were copied by someone with access to a system connected to the DNC internal network, and that this action had no bearing on the files submitted to Wikileaks and were most likely unassociated with Seth Rich, and definitively not remotely “hacked” from Russia.
I’m not sure why they say this rules out Seth Rich, since I would think he could have had access to the system as a DNC operative.
I assume the source bases that on the fact that the first batch of Guccifer uploads had the name Warren Flood in the meta data, with Warren Flood being a loyal DNC operative:
Gawker incorrectly claimed the metadata showed the document was created in 2015 when it actually indicated the document was created by Warren Flood at a much later date.
The truth is that the metadata shows the document being created 30 minutes before Guccifer2.0 appears to have gotten his hands on it:
Created by Warren Flood on 15th of June at 13:38
There was speculation that the reason the DNC didn’t want FBI looking at the server was because the hack was a set up, designed to justify spying on Trump’s campaign, based on the idea The Donald had “asked” Putin to get Hillary’s missing emails. Maybe, though I tend to think Trump was getting spied on no matter what, and they could easily have found other justification in the foreign business dealings of any campaign worker who was a foreign relations specialist.
The key weakness is why the DNC didn’t want the FBI looking at the server. There had to be something criminal there. It is just impossible to parse what that was for now.
On the bright side, it shows that the establishment still fears pockets of the FBI which they have not yet been able to oust, and replace with their people. As a result, they have to rely on private companies like Crowdstrike, and isolated plants within the federal government to coordinate with them.
Spread r/K Theory, because nothing is what it seems with the lying left
[…] Guccifer Files Not Russian, According To Analysis […]
Hello AC.
What do you think about the satanic face of the UK judge who has condemned Charlie Gard to death once already, and has the opportunity to change his mind on Thursday?
Let’s all keep praying for Charlie.
He is a twoface, which means he is accustomed to hiding something.
Left looks disappointed to me, the right side looks like a very poor approximation of a smile by someone who can’t really smile.
A big clue in this regard is the fact that the Democrats were working so hard to avoid FOIA requests from Judicial Watch. There is still a great deal of information that they don’t want opened up by JW, who have a reputation for getting to the bottom of things.