Leftism Is Not A Mental Disorder

Tough to argue it isn’t after this:

A far-left politician in Norway who was violently sodomized by a Somali refugee is explaining away the crime and begging that his assailant not be deported. Self-hatred is at the root of much political correctness, but rarely has self-abasement reached this level. Jonah Bennett reports for the Daily Caller News Foundation:

Leftist Norway politican Karsten Nordal Hauken was brutally sodomized by a Somali and felt so incredibly guilty in the aftermath he subsequently begged authorities not to deport the man.

Hauken has finally come out to tell the public his story of his rape and forgiveness, Norway’s public broadcasting channel NRK reports.

But I will try.

Notice how this character is more fit, in a Darwinian sense, than you are, when it comes to surviving a brutal occupation. Notice how his type seeks to engender a brutal occupation, that they will survive better than you would because of the subconscious instincts they have to bow down before evil.

Nature programmed the r-strategist this way. He could never out-compete you, one on one, in a free society. In such an environment, his type is destroyed. But that isn’t his game. Unable to compete directly, he has evolved into a machine, designed to import a brutal occupation, and then survive it, as you are killed trying to fight it because of your K-strategist urges.

This isn’t insanity. It isn’t random. This is a subconscious, programmed reproductive strategy designed to allow a weaker, less capable specimen to defeat a more capable specimen. It is exactly like the Australian Giant Cuttlefish example described in the book.

If aliens found our planet, they would devote an entire chapter in the textbook about us, to this reproductive strategy. It would say that r-strategists, being less able to compete directly with their peers, seek to import violent outsiders who will brutalize the entire population. Then they will bow down and grovel, thus allowing them to survive, while everyone else will be killed back in the occupation. It is brilliant really.

They are molding the environment into a violent oppressive one where they will have a survival advantage over us, because it is in their instincts to bow down, and not fight back. It is why they support our enemies when our troops travel overseas, it is why they want criminals freed, and it is why they seek to import violent foreigners. Most amazingly, it is entirely unconscious, and they have no control over it. It is just how they are designed.

They are trying to get outsiders to genocide our K-strategist model of human for them.

It is worth noting, Cuckservatives have the same urges.

This entry was posted in Cuckservatives, Europe, Immigration, Migrant Crime Deniers, Muslims, Psychology, rabbitry, Sexual Deviance. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Leftism Is Not A Mental Disorder

  1. Pingback: Leftism Is Not A Mental Disorder | Neoreactive

  2. Mantis Toboggan says:

    Fantastic post! It’s often temping to claim liberalism is a mental illness, but it’s important to keep in mind that on a subconscious level, these guys know exactly what they are doing. In a lot of ways, I would still consider it to be mental illness, though, because despite the points you make, despite the fact that this is an evolutionarily selected strategy, it is still not a healthy strategy, or a healthy psychology. Not even in the slightest. It is the psychology of evil little gollum-like creatures who are too pathetic to accomplish anything or to even attempt to emulate greatness – so they aim to subvert it by any means necessary, even if it means importing a brutal occupation and willing to subject themselves to it willingly. There’s some very potent self-hate laced in with all of this.

    It may be a good strategy in evolutionary terms, where pure survival is what counts, but in a moral framework or a health-based framework, it is the ultimate failure.

    The proclamation “give me liberty or give me death” takes on a whole new meaning when you think of it in the context of this type of genetic war. If the r-strategist’s existence was the only way to survive, I would pick death.

    • Musashi says:

      Also, they’re assuming the imported occupiers will not kill them next.
      I wouldn’t make that assumption where Muslims are concerned.

  3. I still have problems to rationally accept this because I find it so utterly disgusting and hopeless at the same time.
    What can we hope for, if this happens to an individual and they still double down on their believes.

  4. Aeoli Pera says:

    It is worth noting, Cuckservatives have the same urges.

    Twist dat shiv.

  5. FrankNorman says:

    But would such an occupation really give them a survival advantage?

  6. Musashi says:

    And that is why these fucking traitors are to be dealt with first when the lights go out.

    After they’ve been properly cleansed the sundry mystery-meats can get theirs.

  7. Sunspot says:

    >What can we hope for, if this happens to an individual and they still double down on their believes.

    No, you should be optimistic. You feel hopeless because you’re motivated by logic/morality/etc and thus your whole life in dealing with r-types has been one failure after another so far, because you’re using a fire sword against a creature with 100% fire resistance.

    The weapon to fight r’s is easy to wield, but you will just feel like an asshole wielding it. Get over that. Use the proper weapon against them: shaming, puffing yourself up big, and telling them that a huge overwhelming majority (and NOT the kind they’re adapted to survive amongst) is gonna get them.

    This actually works, where appealing to their non-existing sense of honor, logic, morality, and empathy just bounces off every time.

    So don’t be hopeless, just switch weapons!

  8. Pingback: Nature programmed the r strategist this way He...

  9. Pingback: Leftism Is Not A Mental Disorder | Anonymous Conservative – The Americanist

  10. Pingback: The Treachery and Self-Deception Behind the Rhetoric of Compassion – PA

  11. Frank Gappa says:

    It is an interesting analysis and this has happened before in history, women in particular flee to the open arms of the invaders. However, if you look at the ISIS attacks for example, the terrorists are targeting Liberal soft areas like coffee shops, airports, night clubs etc. Do we not think that the Brussels bombing did not take out 95% Liberal travelers? I don’t think the weak survive in great numbers during invasions. It is the resistance of real men that saves the day.

Leave a Reply