New Study: Leftist Men Are Weak And Pathetic

No really, they’ve proved it conclusively:

Don’t tell John Prescott, but maybe socialists are socialists because they aren’t that good in a fight. Conversely, free marketeers may not actually have a sincere belief in the power of Adam Smith’s unseeing hand – and instead have a justified belief in the power of their clenched fist.

A study has found that weaker men are more likely to be in favour of redistributive taxation. The strong on the other hand, who in their cavemen past had no problems controlling both women and resources they had no intention of sharing, are far less likely to see the virtue of egalitarian social policies.

That is one interpretation of research by academics from Brunel University, who assessed 171 men for how buff they were…

My guess is, this has to do with two effects. High long form DRD4 carriage probably produces a more hedonistic personality, less tolerant of the discomfort that is involved in working and building muscles. That produces a frailer, less daring character that is more likely to fail in competitions. There may also be an epigentic effect involved in those who are placed in an r-selected environment. This is probably related to the reversal in sex-specific characteristics that occurs in the shift to r.

The other factor is, once you have a child growing up afraid of discomfort and hardship, and physically inferior, they will probably be conditioned to avoid competition, and this will burn into the brain the more r-selected psychology that expects free resource provisioning.

This is the r-selected psychology’s origin, at a strict, mechanistic micro-level. At the larger macro-level, you have the evolution of a psychology that is ideal for the r-selected environment of glut. It is at once, both practical at the micro-level, and elegant at the macro-level. For that reason, of all the mechanisms nature has had at its disposal, this is the one which she selected to exploit the environment of glut.

It also explains why the cucks who fancy themselves the intellectual right, seem so detached from the desires of the grassroots right these days, and why all of the establishment seemed to find this innocuous incident so triggering:

Now what we need is a study looking at the level of Narcissistic Personality Disorder among the cucks and the left.

Spread r/K Theory, because there is nothing the leftists can do about it

This entry was posted in Conservatives, Cowardice, Cuckservatives, Dopamine, DRD4, K-stimuli, Liberals, Politics, Psychology, r-stimuli, rabbitry, Trump. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
6 years ago

[…] New Study: Leftist Men Are Weak And Pathetic […]

Snafui
Snafui
6 years ago

Environment can have quite the epigentic effect:

In high school, my girlfriend came over to my house, seeing 140 lbs on the bench press she asked to try it; she did 10 reps without breaking a sweat. She is 5’2″ and weighed 135 lbs at the time. Later, at various times of dragging her to the gym, while lifting weights people would stare and a lot of men wandered off to do something else.

While I was impressed then, I later learned that this innate strength was related to generations of abuse which did end the marriage because she could not function healthily due to the mental health trauma. This trait was passed to my daughter, who was also abused–not by me, I was out of the picture when it occurred. And now my grand-daughters are showing signs of this kind of strength.

While her strength is abnormal, and quite extreme, it would serve a purpose for survival were men not around but otherwise is actually an impairment because she was under the impression she didn’t need me around which then put our daughter at risk thus continuing the cycle.

dirkhblog
Reply to  Snafui
6 years ago

The difference in appearance between Homo S. and Neanderthals is mostly epigenetic, says wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal#Epigenetics
Maybe times of hardship does that. Reversibly.

Pitcrew
Pitcrew
6 years ago

No question who’s in charge there. Every euro that NATO puts to defense is one less that is handed to 3rd world migrants so he’s right to throw those pussies around.

John Morris
6 years ago

A lot of words to express a simple thought. Socialism will always be an appealing idea to everyone on the left side of the Bell Curve. Preventing those people from voting their desires into law is the single most important task facing our species.

Duke Norfolk
6 years ago

I find it hilarious how triggered people were by that incident. It was such a nothingburger when I saw it, after hearing all the pearl-clutching and outrage from the press. Not that I was surprised, but I really thought it must have been more than even that little minor thing.

Of course it’s much easier to understand it all when you have the lens of r/K to see it through.