Political Civil War Approaches

More ITZy goodness, hot and freshly baked:

Last week Trump supporters and leftist social justice warriors met on the political field of battle in Berkeley, California. Words were exchanged, as were punches. And while an alt-right leader was punched in the face, by all accounts even the social justice warriors admit that they got a major beat-down.

This prompted a reddit discussion among the left’s tolerant resistance movement, with many asking how they can more effectively go to war against anyone who disagrees with their social, political, and economic views.

The anti-Trump protesters at the rally were ill-prepared for what they came to Berkeley to confront and now they are trying to figure out ways to ensure it doesn’t happen again.

In short, as predicted, they are turning to militancy and mob action by mobilizing individuals and groups to attend combat training seminars, acquiring better equipment like baseball bats and helmets, and of course, if things really go bad… guns.

Yes, we seemed to have lost today. The alt-right held their ground. If we wanna take action against them, we need to be better organized and better trained. It doesn’t help that it’s only the far left opposing them, any trump supporter can be radicalized far easier than any liberal…

We also need better equipment, I know the bandanna and hoodie look is our trade mark, but I saw the right wearing motorcycle helmets, and baseball helmets. A dude wearing a helmet is going to keep going if he get punched, our guys are going down.

One dude was wearing a Spartan helmet, so things are heating up.

Berkeley Police were seen sitting in Police cars, and not getting involved. When asked why, one officer said, “Ask our Police Chief.” Clearly the Police Chief is waiting until people get killed, and hoping those people will be conservatives. But we are not yet into the place where the police will be free to do as they please, because the politicians will fear them.

This is amygdala building up, and it is heading to murder. My assumption is the leftists will use IEDs, rather than actually fire a gun. A pipe bomb is less face to face, and can be dropped in a crowd on a delay. When Hippies wanted to kill cops in the sixties, they used bombs. It doesn’t require skill, discipline, or calm nerves while facing your enemy.

But a gun is not impossible either. I’d think it would be a small, easily concealable, quieter piece, maybe .22, .25, or .380. If you are partaking of this, a little Kevlar under your MAGA T-shirt might not be a bad idea. Alternately a backpack with some Kevlar in it will not impede motion as much, and it will allow a safer exit from any scene.

I do not see how the left goes from this back to the moderate democrats that saw JFK’s patriotic rhetoric as their ideal candidate. We are all diverging, and it is happening faster and faster.

It would seem it is a fairly straight line from this to Apocalypse.

Tell everyone about r/K Theory, because we need to demoralize the left as quickly as possible

This entry was posted in Amygdala, Conservatives, ITZ, K-stimuli, Out-grouping, Politics, Psychology, Splintering, War. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Political Civil War Approaches

  1. Pingback: Political Civil War Approaches | @the_arv

  2. Pitcrew says:

    Guns will probably never be cheaper than they are now. Truly a buyer’s market.

    • There are 86,000 M1 Garands coming back from Korea, if I am not mistaken.

    • David says:

      Palmetto State has periodically offered S&W M&P Shields for $245 shipped to your ffl (after rebate.) This is a STEAL. It’s one of the best pistols on the market, especially with Apex Tactical’s aftermarket sear & trigger (easily installed.) Add a rubber grip sleeve & replace the magazine internals with the +1 version from magguts dot com & you have THE best defensive pistol on the market (IMO) for less than $500. The closest alternative is a $1200 Springfield Armory EMP.

  3. John Calabro says:

    Hey Anonymous Conservative, I think you would prefer JFK over any other presidents after Nixon (bar the Donald). This is since he was more K than almost all Republicans today and almost up there with the Donald. He even supported Joseph McCarthy and went after Communist. He wanted to make the US dollar under a sliver and cut back on the CIA. South Vietnam he supported with weapon and bombs runs but did not want US troops on the ground. He also threaten to go to war with the Russian if they did not take their weapons out of Cuba, making them back down. and yes he took a lots drugs but this was most in part due to the back pain and health problems. To some this might seem r but let me explain why I think not.

    I have have some painful surgery in the past and I think I know what real pain feel likes having a rib bone removed and month sewn close to move the blood from the bottom lip to the top. Before I was given the drugs (legal) painkillers by the nurse to make me forget about the pain it was hard to think straight. I know that sounds weird but major pain you can’t think of anything but the pain, even food and sex don’t matter. Once the pain goes away or soften you then can think.

    Anyway I will give you this from the New York Times I think you will like this:

    John Kennedy’s views, on communism and the Soviet threat, were not so different from McCarthy’s either. Although a loyal Democrat, Kennedy had also bashed the Truman administration for its dismal China record. One night in February 1952 he heard a speaker at Harvard’s Spree Club denounce McCarthy in the same breath as Alger Hiss. Kennedy shot back, “How dare you couple the name of a great American patriot with that of a traitor!” Later he would back the Communist Control Act, a measure that went far beyond anything McCarthy had ever proposed, by virtually outlawing the Communist Party in the United States. During the debate on McCarthy’s censure in 1954, while most Democrats lined up against him Kennedy warned that censure might have serious repercussions for “the social fabric of this country.” And when the actual censure vote came, John Kennedy carefully contrived to be in the hospital for a back operation, so that he would not have to cast a vote against a man who was wildly popular with not only his father but his Irish and Italian constituents.

    http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/h/herman-mccarthy.html

    • Interesting blast from the past. He did have a great anti-commie streak. But I wonder why JFK really pulled air support from the Bay of Pigs? I was just reading about that, and man it was blood boiling.

      • John Calabro says:

        The Bay of Pigs operation was based on false information and lies. Should JFK had supported the men (Cubans exiles) with an air strike?

        Well first JFK only sign off on the operations after being told by his intelligence that there would be massive support in Cuba for these rebels. The information came from those that left Cuba, well the intelligence agencies should of known better. Second someone high up in the US government must of pass the information along to the either the soviets or Communist Cubans since the operation failed very quickly. A red flag comes up to me.

        This is why I think not going into a war but instead finding the Communist in the government was more important in the long run (and I know you might disagree might of save the USA some time). If this is true, how would the air strike go if there is a mole. The Cuba army would know a strike is coming and might even know the time and place they would react. This would then need the US to actually go to war to save a few CIA train Cubans exiles. While having someone high helping the enemy.

        Also 1. The soviets and the rest of the world finding out the operations and 2. American solider lives in fighting a war on an Island that very few Americans care about. Unfortunately for many Americans Vietnam War happens years later under LBJ. I will remind you JFK did not want to go in there either.

        Obama had a similar thing in Libra and Syria both rebels supported and train by intelligence agencies. He chose to air support the rebels in Libra but could not get the american people support for Syria. Libra today is a base for terrorist and is now a path way for illegal immigration. It now probably requires the USA to station troops or to put a dictator supported by the US to stop this. How would the Bay of Pigs be different?

  4. Mr Twister says:

    Please AC

    When sharing Anonymousconservative.com on twitter we get a great first impression
    https://twitter.com/Mr_Twister101/status/854946484831363074

    But the complaint it’s JUST trying to sell a book! Is what often returns from people in comments sections.. which is infuriating because it was a comment in such a section [disqus] that introduced me and well.. i agree.. it is the thing!

    When sharing
    Anonymousconservative.com/blog/home-page
    Which in my opinion is a better introduction to r/K, you just get a link, no graphic.

    Also, access to the /blog is difficult if not impossible from the .Com page a prominent link to both from the .com would be appreciated.

    Many thanks in advance

    Mr T

  5. David says:

    Change comes with or without physical battles, so the impulsive urge to engage in mass demonstrations should be resisted by those who wish to maximize the odds of them leaving descendants. No amount of kevlar helps much against a bomb or a head shot.

    But everyone plays their assigned role in this process. None of us are objective observers.

    • timothyzak says:

      David, that may be true, and I certainly wouldn’t advocate impulsive demonstrations over trivial matters. But there comes a time when unless you’re ready to stake your safety for prevention, you will lose a lot more security over the long haul by compromised social systems.

      Nothing is free. Not even free rides – certainly not in the environment where free riders can be more readily identified.

  6. There are, according to the statistics, about 300 million firearms in the country and I would surmise that most of those not in use by police or military are in the hands of people on the right side of the political spectrum. We are the ones who support the 2nd Amendment. Same goes for those who have any kind of martial arts training or fighting skills of one sort or another. The left seems not to have thought this through very well.

Leave a Reply