The sculptor of Wall Street’s “Charging Bull” statue on Wednesday demanded the removal of the “Fearless Girl” statue that’s faced off against the bull since last month.
Arturo Di Modica said his 11-foot-tall bull is supposed to represent “freedom in the world, peace, strength, power and love” but “Fearless Girl” has turned his work’s message into something negative.
I actually think the artistic message is perfect. Freedom, peace, strength, power, and love are an unstoppable force. They face a powerless girl who opposes all of them, and is too stupid to realize she is about to be trampled under foot mercilessly. The imbecile feminists who gather around, fawning over the work, only make it better. It is a living work of art portraying modern rabbitry.
If they want to be bipartisan though I think I should be allowed to sculpt an Islamic warrior holding a broadsword that is dripping with blood. Then I can put that statue next to the fearless girl statue, after I saw fearless girl’s head off and lay it on the ground in front of it. Around it I would put two or three more jihadis, holding AK’s in the air and firing them off, maybe with a couple of kidnapped sex slaves with ropes around their necks on their knees in the background.
I think it would be great. Fearless girl stood up to the status quo in the first world, and ended up dead as her brethren were enslaved and raped, because she was an idiot – and because the status quo she opposed was goodness.
And after she was killed, that goodness she opposed would still be poised to trample the fuck out of everything that was left.
[…] Bull Sculptor Wants Fearless Girl Statue Removed […]
No no. Put the statue of a politician with his trousers opened behind the girl.
We can just play tit-for-tat. You’re allowed to change the first artist’s intent with an addition? Fine.
Put an American soldier shielding the girl, like this:
http://i.imgur.com/GmMih6Z.jpg
That would be excellent.