Historically, a sign of baseline amygdala stimulation. She also looked faintly off when she walked out.
- Since beginning this site, we have encountered what most people would never believe could exist - the massive domestic network of spies and civilian informants, exactly like the East German Stasi, that has been created and deployed against the American people within America, by whoever controls our government. If you are a conservative who supports Donald Trump, it is most likely operating in your neighborhood, and spying on your family, even though you have never seen it, and would never believe it possible. Our writings on this subject are the most important contribution this website will make for America, which is why it is at the top of our sidebar. You need to click here first.
Interesting Links
An Examination of the Domestic Surveillance Informant Network
Narcissism and the Fractured Amygdala
Touching the Raw Amygdala: An Analysis of Liberal Debate Tactics
The Amygdala Hijack In Action – A Video Example From Gary Busey
Amygdala Hijack In Action – Sentencing Day
Strategies for Dealing with Narcissists in Family and Social Circles
GATE General - An Analysis of the Oddities of the Gifted And Talented Enrichment Program
Politics and r/K Selection – A Graph
The Forces Exerted By r and K-Selection Effects Mold the Ideological Inclinations of Societies – How Resource Availability Determines Destiny
Neurological Correlates of Political Ideology and Homosexuality - The Extreme r-Hypothesis of Homosexuality
DRD4 Long Form Variant (7r) - A Genetic Correlate Between Liberalism and Homosexuality - The Extreme r-Hypothesis of Homosexuality
Please check out the book, The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics, which is available at Amazon at the link below. Buy the book now at Amazon.com here: What are r and K? This site asks for your help in promoting the idea that our political ideologies evolved from r/K Selection Theory in evolutionary ecology. In evolutionary ecology, r and K describe two fundamental psychologies seen in nature, designed to adapt an organism to either a glut or a shortage. Rabbits are r-strategists, designed to exploit free resources, like fields of grass. The five psychological traits inherent to the r-strategy are docility/conflict-avoidance, promiscuity/non-monogamy, single-mom'ing, early sexualization of young, and no loyalty to a competitive in-group. All help this glut-exploiting psychology to out-reproduce everyone else by avoiding danger, mating widely starting young, booting offspring early to mate again, and never risking for others . Wolves are K-strategists, designed for when resources are too limited for everyone to survive. The five traits of a K-strategist are competitiveness/ aggressiveness/protectiveness, competitive mate monopolization/ monogamy, high-investment two-parent rearing, only mating when mature, and high loyalty to one's competitive in-group. All these traits either help you win when you have to fight, or produce and protect fitter offspring, so they will win in a dangerous world that culls the weak. Our political battle is one between a glut-exploiting r-reproductive strategy of rabbits designed to produce raw numbers and a shortage-surviving K-reproductive strategy of wolves designed to produce quality. The swings between conservatism and liberalism at the societal level are not the result of logical argument or reasoned debate. They are the result of psychological shifts produced by perceptions of K-stimuli in the environment such as conflict, danger, and shortage, or r-stimuli, such as safety, pleasure, and abundance. These perceptions trigger ancient mechanisms in the brain that adapt psychology to environment. All of politics and much of history are r vs K. Please consider helping to spread this theory by telling others about this site. As you can see by the shocked 5 star reviews on the book's Amazon page linked above, this idea, and the science behind it, blows people away when they see it. And best of all, it will utterly demoralize and crush any leftist you describe it to, in unbelievable fashion. This idea's beneficial effects on our governance and our freedom cannot be overestimated, if it can only spread. Blogroll
- A Grassroots Conservative Media Production Company – BillWhittle.com
- Audacious Epigone
- Bustednuckles
- Chateau Heartiste
- Day by Day Cartoons
- Dissecting Leftism
- Free Domain Radio
- Jihad Watch
- Joe Huffman
- Krauser on Game
- Lady With a Truck on Narcissists
- Matt Forney
- Moonbattery
- Neon Nettle
- NeuroEconBlog
- Nice Deb
- PA World and Times
- ProgressingAmerica
- Red Ice Radio on Europe's K-Renaissance
- Six Sigma Game
- Stares at the World
- The Bloody Shovel
- The Burning Platform
- The Feral Irishman
- The Reason For My Faith
- The Right Stuff
- Uncle Bob's Treehouse
- Unorthodoxy
- Vault-Co/Texas Arcane/Cleve Blakemore Substack (Currently Active)
- Vault-Co's Archives
- VDARE
- Vox Populi
- Western Man
- Western Rifle Shooters Association
Meta
[…] Hillary’s voice is rough… […]
Are you on Gab?
After reading this blog for the past few months I did notice a few things like how he outgrouped her with Podesta. I also wonder is she covered a cough with a fake laugh about Aleppo. Definitely she was looking down more and avoiding eye contact as the debate wore on. But she didnt stroke out and was able to walk down the stairs unassisted (i think…actually i didnt see that part, just assuming)
Yeah, a full on stroke would probably have taken direct confrontation that might have seemed un-Presidential, given her medication. But Donald definitely hit her between the eyes, amygdala-wise, and I think it manifested in her bitterness. She was not a bemused Ronald Reagan, but rather a butter ex-wife, which I think should negate the fawning that I am sure the media will do, and it might even give Donald a boost. Nobody wants to look at her for eight years.