If you have Liberal Brain Damage, nothing is worth fighting for – even a girl being raped.
The recent case of Steubenville high school students callously making a video of the rape of a classmate is an excellent case study of Liberal brain damage – how the Liberal’s pursuit of a pacifistic, r-selected society produces an atrophy of the very brain structure needed to fight evil. This purposefully created Liberal brain damage produces a surreal abandonment of values and traits that we would normally hold dear, if left to our own devices.
In this case, a group of high school students carried an unconscious, drunk girl, from party to party, while repeatedly stripping her naked and sexually assaulting her. While this was going on, other students watched, texting updates on the attack and posting videos to social media. Nobody stood up and tried to stop it. Two of the perpetrators have since been convicted.
These are the rabbit people which Liberals create, all of them exhibiting the fundamental trait of the Liberal – Liberal brain damage. All of these guys have been raised in a nation where Liberals have made a conscious effort to atrophy the critical brain structure required for flagging immoral material, and driving opposition to it – the amygdala. This is purposefully inflicted brain damage, designed to produce a human that is so lacking in honor that they are incapable of standing up and fighting for anything.
The amygdala is the brain structure which first flags something negative as significant to the brain, and which then nags our brain with an unpleasant aversive stimulus, until we fix the problem which the amygdala perceives. In Liberal brains, this structure is found to be measurably deficient in MRI examinations of the brains of Liberal ideologues. Liberal brain damage is real, and the damage can actually be seen when you look at a Liberal brain.
To inflict this brain damage, first Anticompetitive Liberals portray all competitive sports (which develop the amygdala with experiences of success and failure) as evil and wrong, from tag to dodge-ball. They will even ban these games, to prevent children from exercising this brain structure in any way. From each child’s earliest days, the slightest hint of aggression (an amygdala-driven behavior), even be it chewing a pop-tart into the shape of a gun, is taught to be unacceptable through aggressive punishment. The innate aversion to open sexuality (produced by amygdala activation) is removed through desensitization, while students are taught that judging any behavior of others (also an amygdala-driven behavior) is unacceptable. All of this is purposefully inflicted brain damage, designed to produce Liberalism in these youth.
At the neurological level, this is all about turning off the amygdala, so it will never be exercised, or developed. If the amygdala is never trained to flag something as significant, judge it as bad, and drive a selfless, aggressive behavior to attack it or avoid it (all functions the amygdala performs), if individuals are actually punished in childhood for allowing their amygdalae to operate in such a fashion, is Steubenville really surprising? This is precisely how Liberal brain damage manifests – these young men have been rigorously trained to behave like a Liberal. Don’t judge, don’t get upset, and never resort to aggression, no matter what is happening. It is all purposefully inflicted Liberal brain damage.
Our public education system spends our tax dollars teaching these children that aggressive men are bad, that men judging the behavior of others is bad, that women never need protection, that all manner of sexual behavior is not only acceptable, but to judge it is criminal, and that nothing is ever worth fighting over. Our culture idolizes the Lindsey Lohan’s and Chris Brown’s, who never suffer any consequence for any behavior. Be acceptable and you are unacceptable. Be unacceptable and you are acceptable. It is all upside down, because Liberals are brain-damaged, r-selected psychologies in a K-selected species.
Is it any wonder that no young man was there who would step up and make a stand to try and stop this? Suppose one had, and a fight had erupted? Who would Liberals castigate as the enemy? In a Liberal brain damaged world, to not have Liberal brain damage means you need to be punished until you exhibit it.
We see this here, as Leftists increasingly enact policies and cultural norms designed to shield amygdalae from any unpleasant stimuli, whether it be trying to normalize the grossly aberrant and indecent or forcing upon society the brain-damaging conflict-aversion of political correctness. Each new policy, by shielding the amygdala from any unpleasantness, by shutting it off, produces a population of Liberal-brain-damage zombies, whose amygdalae are non-functional. These damaged and atrophied amygdalae will flag nothing as significant or unpleasant, no matter how heinous. Here in the Steubenville case, a guy walks in on his two friends raping an unconscious girl, and it is nothing significant. The difference between that, and the armed Nazi’s who saw the picture below, and thought nothing of it, is a matter of degree, no matter how large.
Liberal brain damage will make this seem like a normal everyday occurance – and even if it wasn’t, it wouldn’t be worth getting violent over.
In both cases, things which should have provided enough aversive stimulus to motivate fighting were brushed off as insignificant, due to Liberal brain damage. This is exactly why Hitler could so easily man the various death camps he ran, where innocent women were herded to their deaths, their children often clinging fearfully to their legs. Liberal brain damage produces the very banality of evil, by rendering everything unexceptional.
Wherever horrors are ignored by cowards, it is due to the Liberal brain damage of the rabbit-people, often usually purposely inflicted on the populace in the hopes that everyone will reject all judgmentalism and discrimination. As Liberalism progresses, each amygdala becomes wholly incapable of producing aversive stimulus in response to the site of evil. Once amassed, all of this Liberal brain damage can easily become the seed of an evil we cannot imagine, if we allow it to grow. It is designed to accept evil, bow obsequiously before it, and carry out its orders, without question or objection, no matter what they are. Nothing is worth fighting.
The saddest thing is, all of this Liberal brain damage is really created not by r-selected Liberals, so much as by the failings of the K-selected Conservatives in society. All brain damaged rabbit-people have an element of the prey species in them. Whether it be their desire to re-wild America with large man-eating predators, or their innate desire to side with whoever is the most violent in their environment, be it criminal or terrorist. We Conservatives fail to constrain Liberalism, solely because in being polite and respectful of evil cowards, we invite the contempt of the cowards for our weakness.
If ten Conservative kids had risen up, and delivered the beating that these rapists deserved, Liberals would have risen up in outrage. “It was vigilante-ism!,” they would have cried. However, as weak and pathetic Liberals, they would have been helpless to do anything about it, without the acquiescence of K-selected police officers, and the K-selected community. Is a Liberal going to confront a Conservative, face to face and subdue him? The very idea of a Liberal coward standing up and risking his own safety personally for anything is preposterous. He has Liberal brain damage.
Of course in such a scenario, the nascent rapists would never again have sunk to such depths – their amygdalae would have been trained by the shock of aversive stimuli – their Liberal brain damage cured in one shock treatment. If adult Conservatives then rose up, and posed a threat of any form to any Liberal who dared open their mouth in support of the rapists, Liberals would have retreated into the shadows, never to be heard of again, never to damage another brain with their stupidity and cowardice.
They would only have returned when Conservatives became “civilized” and respectful, at which time the Liberals would again set about normalizing rape, eliminating empathy, and sympathizing with the savages. It is our civilized natures which are most responsible for the destruction of our civilization, before our very eyes. That, is due to our own Liberal brain damage, which has caused our own amygdalae to not activate strongly enough to motivate us to deal with a problem which is right before us. That too, will be fixed by the coming collapse.
A lot of people in the American Left deride Russian President Vladimir Putin for his repression of Russian r-Leftist groups like Pussy Riot. Yet, I have no doubt, were President Putin to allow such groups to begin openly attacking Russia and its leadership, promoting sexual indecency and deviancy, and demanding leftist concessions of the government, Russia would begin a slide into r-Liberalism, immorality, and the same collapse which now stalks our nation, would be eagerly awaiting them as well.
Say what you will, under President Putin’s leadership, Russia is remaining strong and united, precisely because the r-psychologies are repressed. Even the moral effects of this on the Russian society are obvious. How many of us would have reacted with shock if a story of callous rape such as in Steubenville emerged in Moscow, instead of America? How many Europeans would be surprised if the Russians tolerated cases of Muslim gang rapes of young Russian girls in Moscow, instead of Europe? What does it say about American and European moral values that acts of savagery that we are unsurprised by in our own cultures, would seem out-of-place in nations such as Russia? Why are we willing to expect better of the Russians, than our own nations?
On the bright side, I predict that when the times comes for the pendulum to shift back, it will not take a great show of force for the Left to come scampering to the feet of Conservatives, Stockholm-Syndrome-style, supportive of all that Conservatism stands upon, and eager to please.
For of all the shortcomings of values and honor the left exhibits, they all pale into insignificance beside the fundamental, underlying traits of Liberal brain damage– pathetic cowardice and groveling before threats.
Total pseudoscience bullshit in your post. http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/04/08/brain-scans-lean-left-right/
Your idiot narrative about rabbits and wolves makes you sound like a bratty teenager who just read Ayn Rand for the first time. It’s a complete fantasy designed to make you feel better about your worthless life.
I am not sure how the article relates, given that the research it cites is actually some of what is on other areas of this site, supporting the contention that politics is just r/K selection Theory, intellectualized.
The rabbit/wolf analogy is actually an attempt to simplify this new concept regarding ideology. It associates ideology with r/K Selection Theory in Evolutionary Ecology. Basically rabbits are docile, prone to flee from danger, promiscuous, supportive of single parenting by single moms, prone to embrace earlier sexualization of offspring, and they have no loyalty to in-group. Notice, that is all identical to the Liberal’s psychology. Those behaviors travel together for a reason – that is the single best way, in nature, to exploit free resources. In r/K Theory it is called the r-selected reproductive strategy.
Likewise, wolves are K-strategists, and they tend to be aggressive/competitive/protective, they are sexually selective, monogamous, they carefully raise offspring with two parents, they discourage early mating in offspring, and they have a high degree of loyalty to in-group and disregard for out-group interests. Again, those traits travel together commonly in nature, because when resources are scarce, and competition is necessary to acquire them, you want to be aggressive yourself, and you want to produce kids which are as genetically fit and capable in competition as possible. If resources are scarce, and you bumble around afraid to fight, and not careful about who you choose as a mate, you will get killed, as will your less fit offspring.
The funny thing is that the rabbit-wolf meme hits you enough that you feel compelled to post. Were I to stumble on a site saying Conservatives were zucchinis, and Liberals were broccoli, I wouldn’t feel the need to post, because I wouldn’t be emotionally affected by the argument. But here, you see Liberals presented as bunnymen, Conservatives likened to wolves, and it affects you enough that you have to say something. On some level, I think you are seeing how under such circumstances, approximating a state of nature, Liberals wouldn’t last two seconds in the combat it would require.
One of our other contentions is that Liberals are programmed to feel overwhelming discomfort at the thought of that free, unconstrained state of nature, where resources are only acquired in open, face to face competition and combat. That is natural for an r-selected psychology, because as things get competitive, you need to avoid the competition. That discomfort is designed to motivate you to move outward, seeking freely available resources elsewhere.
It is an interesting idea. Stop by the section on r/K Theory in our header, and take a look.
Well, I’m not a liberal or a conservative, so nice try on your armchair psychology there, champ. Maybe try another box of cracker jacks and see if you can find a new degree that works a little better for you.
No, I posted because reading these posts where you tools thump your chests and crow about how you’re big, bad wolves is just beyond hilarious. Especially as half of you don’t even have jobs, since no employer wants idiot misogynists working for them. But hey, you help each other hawk your books and review each other’s shit because no one else reads it. Nice sausage circle jerk you’ve got going. That you wrap up your simplistic ideology in pseudoscientific bullshit is probably the only thing about your infantile narrative that actually causes me any level of anger, the rest is just me sitting here laughing at the lot of you. Not only that, but something like half of your political bedfellows don’t even believe in evolution. Can’t have it both ways, brohim.
Go howl at the moon or something.
Hello, “Dan.”
I love running into Liberals like you, with your scattershot logic. First, I was thinking, I’m not sure you know what a misogynist is, since I haven’t really touched on that here – you might want to look that one up. But then, as I analyze your post, I notice that if you do know what it is, it is strange for someone who represents themselves as a man, to immediately denigrate another guy with that term, before all others, especially when it doesn’t really fit this site. Why that term? I would have expected to see racist, class-ist, bigot, even asshole, etc before misogynist, from a man. Since as a Liberal, your subconscious goal is to out-group me with the group you subconsciously associate with, that indicates the group you mentally associate with is feminists, even before the more general Liberals and the pansy coexist crowd. I thought to myself, strange for a man….
Then I looked at the syntax, and it kind of felt like angry-feminine, especially if I took out the profanity (which is a good gender mask), and looked closely at the try-hard “Champ” and “Brohim.” It also has that childish, wanna-be-clever, feel of an adult assuming the psychological role of a petulant, berating teenager. That is something you often get with female feminists who wish they were younger, and try to act that way to make it so, however they can. It also has a weird feel, like you are a chick, trying to be what you think tough is. “Ya, Champ, Like Totally, Brahim. Sausage Circlejerk! See, I can be cool, and vulgar, and aggressive, just like a guy!”
It even has the attempt to integrate “hip slang,” to show how with-it you are, despite your advancing age. Your use of the term “sausage” to refer to a penis stunk of the feminist’s drive to reduce male genitalia to the role of useless ground meat, so as to assuage a subconscious penis envy. The circle jerk comment combined with “sausage” reeks of a homosexual-themed imagery that any straight guy would be too disgusted by to use, but a feminist would love. And your jump to misogyny also indicates you found your way here through somebody’s game blog, something common among feminist trolls of the alt-right.
So by now, I’m thinking, “I wonder if Dan could be a Chick?” Now you could be a repressed homosexual manboob with a masochistic cuckold fetish, who inhales reflexively and gets chubbed when you see Heartiste’s shiv coming out and notice the gleam in his eye. Anything is possible, but that feels unlikely to me.
So I ran over to the the gender genie, and stuck your posts in. Surprise surprise, it says the linguistic analysis indicates that the material is over-whelmingly female-authored. Bad Girl! You lied to me! Spanky Spanky! (Oh! Amygdala! Amygdala!)
In retrospect, denigrating this site as guys thumping their chests should have been a giveaway. Only a really efette gay guy, who got his ass kicked relelntlessly all through school, or a hardcore feminist would say that.
If you are a feminist (which I beleieve to be true), I will assume you are also banged-out, plumped-up, wrinkled-in, post-abort, over-ripe, and STD positive (I’ll assume warts and herp). I understand your anger, if even just one of those is true. Two or more? Holy Shit! How do you look at yourself?
Looking in the mirror, and contemplating all the hot/beautiful/young/thin things out there with pleasant personalities, their whole bouncy lives of fun and happiness ahead of them? Just falling into blissful LTR’s with Alpha males, and getting families which love them dumped in their lap for nothing – it must be agony. I can’t imagine how frustrating that must be for you. I feel really sorry for you. It’s tough.
And of course, being a truthful non-Liberal, you are a wholly unaffiliated arbiter of truth, and not the least bit Liberal. Got it. I actually could have seen your lack of any partisan affiliation by the non-partisan tone of your posts, if I had looked closely. You are right, I have no idea how people think. I am so glad we can have this debate on such honest terms, and I can trust you.
Onward. So you admit you are angry after reading this site (which is consistent with the tone of your post which is, to put it mildly, bitter-feminist), and you are angry enough to post angry messages. You are even driven to come back, vagina all atwitter, to see if I posted your message, and you even take the time to reply again, with all this anger (between bean-flicks and nipple-massages).
So you are pissed. But you then go on to make a point to say you are laughing at me and the alt-right. Really? I don’t think it sounds like that to the people who will read this. I think they see you as really angry and bitter about this site, and its analysis of the Liberal ideology. (And probably angry and bitter generally about life – another Liberal feminist red flag). So why do you say you are laughing, as if you don’t have a care in the world, when you are so obviously bitter?
As I have posted before, in a different article, you see the Joe Biden laughing thing when Liberals feel intellectually backed into a corner, with no logical way out. Paul Ryan nails Joe Biden with facts he can’t answer, so Joe laughs, and hopes the crowd doesn’t take Ryan seriously, or look too closely at his facts. Liberals even do this in writing, on blogs. Why? Laughter is agony to them, because it means they are out-grouped, and they assume it is similar with us as well. Just writing it in letters on a page should traumatize us.
The laughter is an attempt to manipulate perceptions of the group observing the debate. It is designed to try to downgrade the social status of the Liberal’s opposition, absent the use of factual contradictions or logic. When I see it, I see an angry Leftist/Loser/Failure/Feminist/Liberal/Outcast (take your pick, they are similar shades of the same color), who has nothing else to say to contradict his opposition. And I see someone who fell into that pattern of behavior through the conditioning of constant repetition throughout life.
To those reading, think about it. You tell me X. I show you, factually and logically, how X is completely wrong. Is your reflex to laugh, and not even examine any fact or assertion? These Liberals are conditioned to do that. Imagine how much conditioning/training it must take during critical developmental windows, to produce that reflex. Imagine how often these Liberals were shown up logically in their lives, for them to develop that reflexive behavior when confronted with contradictory facts.
Of course, if I am so wrong, and my position is so obviously facetious, and everyone is laughing at me, it begs the question, why would “Dan” waste “his” precious time and come back and continue to post angry missives? The opposite of love is not hate, and the opposite of being affected emotionally by something is not ongoing angry missives – unless “Dan” is secretly obsessed with my Alphaness, intellect, and raw masculinity. (That would be understandable.)
Personally, if I thought someone was wrong, I would point out where a theory departed from the evidence. Here, I would show where we actually didn’t have two primary ideologies. Or where the drives motivating their behaviors and desires were wholly unrelated to the traits of r/K Theory. Or where the r-ideology counter-intuitively emerged during times of resource scarcity and competition, and that destroyed the theory. Or where the brain structure evidence was off, and brain damage to the amygdala didn’t produce every trait of r, or where Leftist ideologues didn’t have less developed amydgalae.
And if someone showed me factually, where I was wrong, I would have no urge to laugh. I would be forced into a passive, cognitive-regroup, assessing their argument. Dan and I are night and day, lies and honesty, bad and good, weakness and strength. Hardship will eventually cull the chaff – God designed this world that way. Laughing won’t help when K comes, and it is fight or die. Then, “Dan” will need an Alpha Male to protect him, or he will be denied resources and culled. But in r, this social crap can work sometimes, if their opponent isn’t smart enough to see through it.
You also would never catch me just simplistically denigrate anyone else’s theory as “pseudoscience.” I would either prove it wrong with a factual analysis that would wow everyone and humiliate my opposition, or I would cede defeat, and let it stand. I would actually feel bothered just dismissing it as pseudoscience, without taking the opportunity to show off my superior intellectual mastery of the subject, and humiliating my opposition with irrefutable logic.
Of course Dan knows, I have examined every aspect of this work already, with an eye to falsification. Like it or not, it all fits seamlessly. Dan knows that, because if I hadn’t, he would have pointed out a hole, and enjoyed doing it. Instead Dan linked to a news report for one of my source materials, for reasons nobody understands.
So to recap the subtext here, you feel this is important enough in your world to spend your time here. You feel inferior enough as a chick that you sockpuppet as a man, to try and get your opinion taken seriously by the big boys, who you know really run the show (Or you are so homo you actually write just like a girl – ehhh, seems less likely). This work pisses you off enough that you come back again and again. (Probably because at some point in your past, you were in a pseudo-Darwinian social environment and did not fare well, and now Conservatives anger you just by subtly supporting a similar free environment with winners and losers.) You can’t actually point to any study I have misrepresented, or any fact I have wrong here, and so you are apparently unable to attack the work itself, beyond calling names like a child, and denigrating people personally in a general sense. You are set atwitter by my Alphaness. And you lie prodigiously. Got it. Leftist-Feminist.
I do appreciate these replies. A lot of Conservatives don’t really get the visceral emotional response that the logic behind this work has on Leftists, or the deeply rooted emotional need that leftists have, to assuage their own insecurities with blind assertions of the inferiority of everyone else. I don’t think the Conservative readers really get how emotionally wrenching it is to be a Leftist/Liberal/feminist/r-strategist (or associated social loser), espouse the Bunny Psychology, get disparaged as a Bunnyman/Bunnywoman, and then have to try and come up with something, anything, to refute what is clearly a spot on meme linking r/K Theory and ideology. It is torture.
Dan even used the Liberal’s laughing tool that I described in a previous post as a way Liberals try to diminish the status of others in the eyes of observers. Nothing with the Liberal r’s is real, logical, or factual. It is all social, and reflexively manipulative. These real world examples are invaluable to this site, and I appreciate them.
In short “Dan,” please feel free to continue to devote time from your highly valuable life, coming here, getting angry, and telling everyone how unworthy of any consideration or time the material on this site is. I am sure nobody will see the irony. You can then enjoy running home to flick wildly over our “relationship.” Although I find it creepy, I am perfectly willing to tolerate it because the example you set on this site, by your very existence, is priceless.
Holy wall of text, batman.
I used misogynist because of your affiliation with the “manosphere”. I found my way here via Aurini, one of your freaky little lex luthor youtubistas.
Good job on accusing me of being homosexual though. Why is it that you guys– I’m sorry, WOLVES– always go there? Repressed desires projecting onto others? I am, in fact, a guy. The funny thing is that I’m not angry, though I do love thinking about how long it took you to craft your long-winded and off-base reply. So presumptuous, the lot of you.
As far as aging, I’m not that old. Probably about the same age as you. However, I’m old enough and wise enough to know that your silly interpretation of evolutionary theory is wildly deviated from any real science, and is nothing more than a pseudo-intellectual masturbatory fantasy you have that makes you feel superior to others. You’re not. Enjoy your mediocrity.
We’ll ignore your full of shitism in the first comment, on not being Liberal.
Though a 70/30 split is highly feminine, I figured there was a small chance the genie might be wrong, which is why I did leave open the possibility you were a repressed homosexual manboob (even I can’t conclusively tell the difference). So technically, the comment was still accurate, I just didn’t get the fun of shiving a feminist. We’ll wait to see how accurate, when your mid-life crisis hits, after the T. gondii from the cats has had a couple more years to work its magic. Between the Elton John mein, the two cats, and the gender genie results, I’m thinking you will be surprised at how that plays.
Interestingly, after putting various comments of yours into the genie, it seems comments you have with with low emotional valence come out roughly split between male and female. Emotional/angry comments, such as with Aurini or Forney, come out highly female. When you get angry, your syntax changes to that of a chick, and usually by a lot. When I read your comment, I actually felt the same vibe you would get from an angry woman, even down to the trying to be cool by using guy jargon that seemed unnatural on you. I’m sure there is some insight there into cognition, I just have no idea what it could be.
On the r/K and wolf/rabbit, whether you approve or not, it will be how politics is viewed in ten to fifteen years, maybe much sooner. Once resources clamp down in the coming collapse, the population will get grumpy, intolerant, and tend to seek out groups to compete with. Conservative worldviews will rise, and idiots will wonder why.
I would prefer r/K be the meme that spreads this idea, since it is most accurate. But guys like you wouldn’t get it, so I suspect the rabbit/wolf meme vector is how it will spread. Simple, emotional, and funny to enough people to make it spread, while angering enough that the other side is forced to notice it. If you don’t like rabbit, you can substitute any other r-strategist. Deer, mice, pheasants, prairie dogs etc. Of course, there is a competition aversion and disloyalty/self-focus to all r-strategists (and Liberals) which I think is why Libs don’t like the analogy. That, and this work implies we are not just entering an endless slide into ever more Liberalism and happy tolerance. This is a cycle, and Conservatism will return, as will the harsher conditions which favor it by actively disfavoring Liberals.
BTW, technically, I do not consider myself a wolf. That you keep saying that, (and that you seem to think I cover gender roles extensively here) means you either haven’t read this site, or don’t understand what you have read, which makes your attempt to provide an assessment of the work silly.
I am clear that I am instinctually Libertarian (a third strategy which is seen in nature when organisms are spread out to the point they rarely interact, and don’t form packs.) I accept my urges there are not logical, but just an expression of how I am programmed to live – spread out from others, where I am free to do as I please. Cramp me in with others, and I am uncomfortable, regardless of resource availability. I also accept not everyone else is designed to feel that way, or programmed to want what I want. Most are adaptive to high population densities, for obvious reasons. Some are designed for the bunny world where resources are free, and where nobody fights, some are made for the wolf world where resources are limited and everybody fights in packs, and losers suffer. I ally with Conservative wolves, because their strategy is more economically sustainable given the inevitable nature of resource limitation, and it would forestall the economic collapse that is coming, among other reasons. Plus, Libertarianism can’t possibly win, given the population densities which make it highly maladaptive.
But deep down, I accept we likely do not control this, so like Forney and Aurini, I too am just waiting for the pendulum to swing back with the coming snap in resource availability, which will be the financial collapse. I expect that just as after September 11th, (war being one cue of resource shortage in our history) Conservatism will rapidly reassert itself in the population, even if nobody will know why.
Heh, yeah, I assumed “Dan” was a chick after seeing misogynist in “his” post as well. Men, even of the limp-wristed leftist variety, dont tend to use that word.
Dont know why youre bothering to try and debate this twit rationally though. Its pretty obvious that no actual substantive arguments will be forthcoming, and that no matter how persuasive you are “his” mind is not going to change. Its pretty clear this is not going to be a fruitful discourse, since the primary thing “Dan” has to offer is unimaginitive and unoriginal insults. Plus, the few attempts at logical deduction “he” has made shows that thinking isnt really “his” forte.
Surprisingly, he may be a “feminist guy,” obsessed with misogynists, that the gender genie says is a chick when he gets angry. I didn’t see that coming, but you learn something new every day.
On arguing with him, I love subtext. The little things people say which reveal their assumptions and how they think beneath the mask. To me it is fun to take something he says, and try to figure out why he says what he says, and how he thinks. Liberals are like a neverending puzzle.
Arguing with you fools is like having a conversation with a magic 8-ball, a pre-selected dozen responses as if you’re all reading from the same stupidity inducing script. “Oh, you must be a woman. Or a homo. Or a repressed homo.” Get a new shtick. Your old one blatantly highlights your own insecurities.
What I am is irrelevant, though I am none of the things you accuse me of being. I do think it’s interesting that you feel the need to attack my sexuality. I would imagine it comes from the low self-esteem you cover with your false bravado of “alpha-ness”. (Thanks, btw, for the assertion that I am somehow “envious of your alpha stature” or whatever ridiculous claim you made earlier… going to use that for a character in a book… the level of undeserved conceit is astounding and almost impossible to imagine.)
As far as your fantasy of the coming collapse, good luck with your feeble wish for society to fail. You are not at the top of the pack like you think you are, and in fact you never will be. The arc of history is long but it tends toward justice, which we are seeing as western society moves toward more tolerance and acceptance of those who have typically been perceived as outsiders. I can’t even imagine how much it infuriates you to see society progressing away from your backwards and discriminatory ideas (even those in the field of evolutionary biology haven’t advanced your ridiculous r/K-selection theory for nearly thirty years… you’re behind the times again). I’m sure your “pendulum” will be swinging back any day now. Just keep consoling yourself that someday you and your despicable views will be accepted, that eventually all those “liberal rabbits” will come crawling to you for the protection of the wolf pack (though I think my guns will do just fine for that, so please do hold your breath while waiting).
Meanwhile, your original post is so full of falsehoods that it doesn’t even require a response, especially the easily refuted assertions that liberals run from danger (proven false with little effort by the liberals that currently serve in the armed forces and others that work with crisis every day) and your reprehensible attacks on free speech in Russia. I find the things you say to be completely worthless and offensive on almost every level, but I’d still defend your right to say them. Good job for being a useless hack willing to revoke the free speech rights of his political opponents. You’re just as bad as those you hate.
“Arguing with you fools is like having a conversation with a magic 8-ball, a pre-selected dozen responses as if you’re all reading from the same stupidity inducing script. “Oh, you must be a woman. Or a homo. Or a repressed homo.”
First off, I like Matt Forney and Aurini. To guys like us, going to someone’s site to attack them is impolite. We don’t go around to Leftist sites, and try to piss others off in their own homes, because in our eyes, it would be dishonorable. So yes, I will shamelessly hit all the buttons burned into your head in childhood, because you and my friends are enemies. I go with the gay thing because something about you makes me feel like you’ve heard it before under conditions that really sensitized you to it. The 8-ball comment makes me think I’m right.
Now, I love arguing with Liberals because it highlights the most interesting facet of the Liberal Ideology. You guys cannot look at, or accept a truth, if it makes you uneasy or unhappy – even when perceiving that truth is vital to your own survival. You will also invent truths which make you feel good, to assuage your mental stress level. Examples:
“(Thanks, btw, for the assertion that I am somehow “envious of your alpha stature” or whatever ridiculous claim you made earlier… the level of undeserved conceit is astounding and almost impossible to imagine.)”
Of course I always talk like that, and assume others who don’t know me are envious. It isn’t possible that that statement was said tongue in cheek, for humor. You will always try to see your enemies as bad, and in the worst possible light, because it makes you feel better. It clouds your ability to perceive the reality, which is that I actually said that because it was so ridiculous it was funny.
“As far as your fantasy of the coming collapse, good luck with your feeble wish for society to fail. “
I don’t wish for it to fail, I just accept it will. Again, you refuse to see something right in front of you, because acknowledging it will make you uncomfortable. There is no arguing that we are going bankrupt. What is it, 2037, they say we will definitely not have enough to cover Military, Social Security, Medicare, and Debt Service payments? And those are the rosy numbers they tell us – the reality is we might hit that in the early 2020’s, or earlier with Obamacare, and maybe even earlier if banking goes. That can be patched over with printing and policy, but not for long.
That is not a path to increasing government’s size, and continued r-selection. If you could see what I am saying, you would know that if you want all that fuzzy tolerance to continue, government needs to cut itself radically, and austerity needs to be instituted immediately. But even in the face of a reality that is undeniable, you still tell yourself the leftist progression is a one-way street, and we will never go bankrupt, and it will just get better and better forever.
“The arc of history is long but it tends toward justice… “
I am sure Roman Leftists said the same thing, because they just saw their own small portion of the sine wave of history, and it was all in one direction at that moment. Then their society collapsed, and eventually a nearly fully Libertarian United States came to dominate the world. Russia went r, and came back, and may go again someday. For now r is back here, tomorrow it will be gone, and the day after it will return, only to be vanquished again. What is funny is that you can’t consider even the possibility of that, or why it might occur. The arc of history is not long, nor does it go in one direction. It just looks that way because we are so small, and are looking at such a small part.
“which we are seeing as western society moves toward more tolerance and acceptance of those who have typically been perceived as outsiders.”
Again, if you could actually consider something opposite to your worldview, you would see Greece, where the population was more Leftist than you a few years ago, and loved outsiders. Then there was an economic collapse, which Leftists at the time never thought could happen. Now Golden Dawn goes around stabbing immigrants in the ass with ambassador knives to make them want to self deport, and Leftists kiss Golden Dawn’s ass, because they are afraid of them, and need their food aid. Believe it or not, I would actually like to avoid that kind of anarchy, and you (and your inability to consider things outside your comfort zone), are among the biggest obstacles.
Leftists (both in the Democratic Party and the Republican Party) are the one’s taking us there with Obamacare, foreign aid, Big Government spending, etc. Point it out to them, and they immediately attack you as evil, and then continue bringing on the collapse.
“eventually all those “liberal rabbits” will come crawling to you for the protection of the wolf pack”
Actually, no. I linked to an article on Golden Dawn a while back which showed that if Greece was any clue, they do come crawling back. But it isn’t to easygoing guys like me, who are reasonable and unthreatening. They crawl to the guys who are the most violent, and most threatening. The Leftist in the article would only bitch about Golden Dawn off the record, because they were getting food aid and “protection” (in a mafia sense) from them, and paying their party money in return. Imagine Leftists paying Golden Dawn’s bills, and funding their operations.
I know, you will go out in a Scarface-style blaze of glory on behalf of “tolerance and peace.” But the rest of your movement will love the Golden Dawn (or Aryan Brotherhood) as soon as those inner-city poor can’t get food, and begin resorting to flashmob raids to get it (during which a really bad element of that population will be doing some really bad things to the rabbits, under cover of the mob.)
During the last Depression, when people had trouble getting food, we didn’t have Bloods, Crips, or MS-13. Even so, bootleggers, mobsters, and bank robbers made things interesting. This go around, with organized gangs that have state of the art cell phone comms for organizing, sat overheads, social media and online databases for targeting the unarmed, and all the other tech at their disposal? I am happy not to be a Liberal living near that.
“You’re just as bad as those you hate.”
Fascinating statement. Not Liberals are good, and I am bad. Rather, I am just as bad as Liberals (who are just as bad as me (which in your mind is presumably pretty bad.) It implies that you acknowledge Liberals are bad, you just want to attack me by saying I am just as bad. And yet you were just supporting Pussy Riot and the Left a minute ago. It is like me supporting the Mafia as an innocent Italian social club in a debate with an FBI agent, and then finally getting angry and saying, “You are just as bad as the mafia!” This is why I like to debate Liberals. The slips are fascinating, and show such a different psychology than you try to present.
Hey, I just stumbled on your website and would like to say you have a fascinating repertoire of information on r/K selection theory and the inner workings of narcissistic people.
Off-topic, you are painting a VERY wide brush on liberalism and conservatism. There are cowardly conservatives, just as there are brave liberals(although admittedly the Democratic Party is more liable to attract hardcore r types). I believe that in our gene pool, is that if the r/K selection theory is to be believed, we all possess varying levels of r and K type genes, and our current system favours propagation of r-type at the K’s expense. Look at the vilification of masculinity, propagation of a massive welfare state etc.
But isnt the classical theory of selection is: in unstable, changing environments the quick reproducing r-types dominate because of a larger range of variety in the gene pool, while in stable environmental conditions where there are a large amount of competitors the K-type rule because of their innate ability to fight and kill?
But in the end, this is all just a THEORY. I doubt we ve identified specific genes that code for r or K type behaviour.
We as humans have progressed beyond animalistic tendencies, after all.
I hope that you can focus more on the science of this phenomenon and dealing with narcissists we meet everyday. Overtly politicising into this sectarianist, left right paradigm is rather hurtful to people who hold liberal beliefs after all.
Hello Daren. If you read the full body of work here, you will see that r/K is related to dopamine, which actually can wax and wane with usage. So provide free resources, and you will change the dopaminergic signaling system, in such a way a to produce r. There is a genetic effect, and an epigenetic effect, but I am increasingly thinking epigenetics and usage are bigger players than genes.
I have tried to be pretty clear that what I am detailing is a population wide effect. You are correct individuals can mix strategies, and you see that in r/K as well in nature. My case is we have two poles of ideology because overall, nature favors hard r’s and hard K’s, and over the eons, this has culled a lot of people who would otherwise have blurred out those two poles. What was left was the two-pole system. But yes, there are outliers on both sides.
I do feel hard-core Liberalism has inherent in it a lot of the Narcissistic traits. It is about competing, without competing (ie. try to take my guns through political games, but never come to my house, face to face, and take them in open, face to face competition). It is like that in every facet, from economics, to war. Liberals refuse to leave others alone to do their own thing, try to use social manipulation to bend people to their will, and cannot fathom why everyone won’t just do what the Liberal wants (give up money, give up guns, do what the nannystate says, etc.). Of course, I also see a lot of the Narcissist’s insecurity in the Liberal. In Narcissists, they deny reality to assuage their amygdala, while Liberals seem to assuage theri amygdala through using government to try and eliminate environmental strsses, rather than adapt to them themselves, regardless of logic (ie. outlaw guns to try and avoid confronting crime rather than increase their own ability to deal with crime, make everybody have the same level of moderate economic success rather than risk defeat themselves, etc.). It is a similar phenomenon. I believe the rise in Narcissism and the rise in Liberalism are connected, both driven by amygdalae which have learned to avoid bad stuff, rather than confront it and deal with it.
I can’t really lie about that, so you will have to pick and choose what you like.
Fantastic!
For a long time I have searched for a sensible explanation for the heinous droanings of sociologists, apologists, relativists, and other types of Leftists, and I believe you have found something concrete and accessible to a Conservative mindset.
I am finally coming to understand how a mere presentation of facts can trigger foaming-at-the-mouth responses from leftists, especially those who had their brains damaged by too much ( any ) liberal indoctrination at universities, and how an understanding of these fundamental differences can be used to destroy the brains ( and physiologies ) of cowards and bunny-people…
Keep up the good work, I shall buy your book as soon as possible!
Thank you for the kind words.