Because community standards are cool with promoting anal to teen girls, but not with opposing it
In July, Teen Vogue published a “tutorial” for its young readers on how to have anal sex. The article by “sex educator” Gigi Engle was titled “Anal Sex: What You Need to Know,” and featured instructions on the dos and don’ts of consensual sodomy—never mentioning the fact that many of the magazine’s readers are under the legal age of consent…
Among other helpful advice, Engle offered counsel regarding which lube to use and instructed her young readers how to insert sex toys into their butts to “warm up” for “larger objects…”
On her Twitter account, Grace Johnston mocked the editor of Teen Vogue for allowing the irresponsible piece to be published, sarcastically congratulating him for having received an award from The Advocate, which describes itself as “the world’s leading LGBT news source.”
In response, Twitter punished Johnston by suspending her account for 12 hours, provided she remove the offending Tweet, warning her that the tweet violated its user “rules” which forbid harassment and abuse.
To rabbits the article was completely normal. The human is programmed to lose all moral strictures regarding sex among children once it is turned rabbity through amygdala atrophy. So to rabbits there is nothing wrong with producing a manual to help ten year old girls explore anal sex. In the fifties, doing this would get you imprisoned, but today, opposing it gets you banned on Twitter.
Notice how the left’s infiltration of the machine snowballs though. Here, not only is twitter promoting leftism, they are supporting the media machines over everyone else’s voices. The media machine – that self-promoting empire that feeds itself, drives traffic only to its tentacles, and promotes only its own products, would always end up controlling who sees and hears what. But as the left hijacks it, the economic drive to ban those who would challenge it merges with the SJW urge to stifle dissent, and produces a very totalitarian aspect to the dialog.
Intelligence would be wise to note that as we head into a K-shift, there should be American alternative platforms, because if there are not then the majority of the right, which will ascend during K, will end up on foreign, probably Russian platforms, which I am sure will be run and cultivated by Russian Intelligence.
The stronger, more heavily armed, and more capable of the political ideologies in the physical realm is already feeling increasingly alienated from their governments, media/cultural machines, and left-leaning citizens. As economic stresses amp up amygdalae, I could easily see a future where they find themselves seeing foreign entities who provided them refuge as more their own than the left and the establishments of their culture. That would mean, practically, that the next generation of Servicemen, Police, and Intelligence people might have far fonder feelings for the Russian government that provided them refuge as young Chans and Redditors, than they would with Chuck Schumer’s Presidency, Maxine Water’s State Department, and Richard Blumenthal’s FBI.
It raises the question of whether in a globalized world of the future, will national boundaries govern perceptions of “citizenship” as much as ideological boundaries? Already I feel more “Russian” than I do Californian or New Yorkian. Had Hillary won, I would only be held psychologically in the nation by the existence of the real right, the NRA, and the warriors of our nation. Stifle the dialog of real Americans, and you remove much of our psychological binding to the nation.
Already there are forces pulling both ways, and combined with the insanity created by Apocalypse, you see how that will be one more force driving nations to civil war.
Tell everyone about r/K Theory, because somebody has to push normalcy
Interesting, the West’s K’s could abandon it. Russia is not the West. They are similar, but they aren’t Western. Just another sign on the collapse of Western Civ. One couldn’t ask good Christians to tolerate what the left has planned for them though. The people running the government probably won’t allow alternative platforms, as they want an excuse to mistreat Patriots and Christians. They seem to have been working towards this goal since the 1960’s as if satanism is funny and “Vogue”.
Hey anonymous do you think it is good that internet services like Facebook and Twitter are becoming more left friendly and anti right?
I think it is great. These places you can waste so much time and if more right wing people start to realize that these places are bias they will both use it less and only to post meaningless things. I use it now just to bait leftist into showing their real agenda. Ie. I don’t fight them and waste time trying to win convince them or their friends on Facebook or Twitter since I know my reply might get block or the only people looking be leftist themselves or miss guide through the algorithm (meaning a lot people don’t see the post). But by getting say someone to talk more about why they think a certain thing or issue after they post some French flag or Gay married meme is useful information. You get to know them better and see if they are either miss guided on the issue/s, a Stalinist or worst a psychopath who would sell you out in a heart beat. And since the world is not heading into a good we will need to know who to trust.
Interesting perspective. We’ll be driven into reality and the real world, while the left disappears more into the social bullshit.
Never thought of that. Whether it is good or bad may depend on how r the world is. In r, social bullshit is what determines policy. But fi things go K, that will be one more thing that gives the left no power, and wastes their time.
Excellent article. I’m writing this comment after finding this article via Twitter, because my Facebook account is shut down right now. An anon person maliciously flagged my account as fake after I called someone out as a “window-licking level of idiot.” Sigh.