Why Femininity and Monogamy Rule In K-Selection

Here’s Florida State QB Deandre Johnson slugging a girl at a bar after she takes a poke at him.

Personally I’d rank hitting women right up there with root canals and tax audits. But the video demonstrates one form of human psychology, namely the short tempered, aggressive psychology that emerges when resources grow short. As you can see, when men grow short tempered, violence becomes commonplace and you need to fight to get the resources to survive, women are best served not throwing girl punches at the guys around them, and thinking the guys will just run away. Rather they are best served being as sweet as they can be to big strong guys who are innately programmed to feel loyal to them, and to want to kill any guy who screws with them.

The opposite is the modern workplace. Angry, bitchy feminists, constantly keeping the guys around them in line with demeaning statements and threats of sexual harassment lawsuits. In that world, a girl like the one in the video could easily cold-cock a manboob like John Scalzi at the bar, and Scalzi would run off, afraid that the group might question his manboob credentials.

The key is, these models of human sexual interaction – loyal, loving monogamy between a manly, aggressive man and a sweet feminine woman, and manboobs getting slapped around by angry, manly bitches who hold them in contempt and cuckold them along the way, are determined by psychological adaptations to resource availability. Just as I prefer the former innately, there are manboobs out there who will fight to the death for the latter.

But there is no point arguing. You are either a resource-dulled rabbit, or a scarcity-designed wolf. Logic plays no role. The fight over family values cannot be won, anymore than a tide can be reversed. You need only wait until the tide shifts and resources contract, and then you can watch your enemies writhe in tortured agony as all that is good returns, and they are helpless to stop it.