Weeks after Bernie Sanders protégé Tim Canova went down in defeat in a strong primary challenge to US Representative Debbie-Wasserman-Schultz, professional statisticians say they have uncovered the same kind of statistically unlikely voting pattern which was found in the 2016 Democratic primary between Hilary Clinton and Bernie Sanders. They are calling for a visual inspection of some or all of the actual ballots in order to rule out the presence of electronic “vote-flipping.”
Because the two counties involved both use vote-scanning machines which create digital images of the ballots, visual inspection of the ballots could consist of obtaining the digital images held by the counties, and counting the votes using the images rather than the paper ballots…
The vote pattern identified in the analysis of the Canova – Wasserman-Schultz primary, a closely watched race, is uncovered by what election experts call “cumulative vote tally” analysis. This analysis arranges precincts by size – numbers of registered voters – and studies candidate performance along these lines. As with many counties, cities,and towns in the Democratic primaries, the experts found a tendency for the “establishment” candidate to do much better as precinct size increased.
The pattern is suggestive of the electronic version of “ballot stuffing” in larger precincts. The relationship was uncanny, according to the election experts and mathematicians, with no good explanation when controlled for race, income, or any other demographic factor.
As bad as this will be for Trump, imagine how much worse it must be in the r-strategist’s primary, where all of the people involved are helpless, herding, sheep who can’t think for themselves. At least the competitive drive of K-strategists confers a sort of individualist-unctuousness that will naturally stand up to such perfidy.
When you consider all of the forces allied against Trump and bent on the destruction of the nation, and all of the mechanisms they have managed to corrupt to use against him, he really has faced nearly impossible odds at every turn. It is incredible he has created a situation where he could win at all, let alone possibly enjoy a landslide.
You can see how any other Republican would have been consigned to failure before the race even began.
This is the big one. It is either Trump, and maybe the easy way, or Apocalypse, which is definitely not the easy way.
I could almost root for Apocalypse.
[…] A good example here: Weeks after Bernie Sanders protégé Tim Canova went down in defeat in a strong primary challenge to US Representative Debbie-Wasserman-Schultz, professional statisticians say they have uncovered the continue […]
“I could almost root for Apocalypse.”
Jesus can come back any time now, I’m cool with that.
The presstitues are getting nervous:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/10/26/triggered-journalist-snowflakes-scared-trump-supporters-are-turning-on-the-media/
It is the ‘Fractional’ counting by them.
1 – Summary –
This report summarizes the results of our review of the GEMS election management system, which counts approximately 25 percent of all votes in the United States. The results of this study demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically, alter election outcomes by pre-setting desired vote percentages to redistribute votes. This tampering is not visible to election observers, even if they are standing in the room and watching the computer. Use of the decimalized vote feature is unlikely to be detected by auditing or canvass procedures, and can be applied across large jurisdictions in less than 60 seconds.
GEMS vote-counting systems are and have been operated under five trade names: Global Election Systems, Diebold Election Systems, Premier Election Systems, Dominion Voting Systems, and Election Systems & Software, in addition to a number of private regional subcontractors. At the time of this writing, this system is used statewide in Alaska, Connecticut, Georgia, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Utah and Vermont, and for counties in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. It is also used in Canada.
http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-1/
How does it work. Ask Berning Man and California.
After applying various statistical models to subsets of 2016 primary voting data several academic researchers conclude Hillary Clinton’s win was only possible through widespread vote fraud. “the probability of this this happening was is 1 in 77 billion”.
Furthermore, the researchers found that the election fraud only occurred in places where the voting machines were hackable and that did not keep an paper trail of the ballots. In these locations Hillary won by massive margins. On the other hand, in locations that were not hackable and did keep paper trails of the ballots Bernie Sanders beat Hillary Clinton.
http://alexanderhiggins.com/stanford-berkley-study-1-77-billion-chance-hillary-won-primary-without-widespread-election-fraud/
Oh and Diebold Election Systems was started by a RINO, so they still have access, see Ryan 80% versus polling 43% Newland.