Amygdala Atrophy, Disgust, And Gay Blood Donations

Another mile marker:

The Food and Drug Administration has lifted the ban on blood donations from men who have engaged in sexual relations with another man. Now, in order to donate blood, a man will have had to have been abstinent for the period of one year prior to donation.

This new policy is similar to the deferral period for a woman who has engaged in sexual activity with a man who had previously sexual activity with another man, or for someone who has traveled to a country where malaria is prevalent.

The Food and Drug Administration released final rules on Monday that would allow gay and bisexual men to donate blood if they have been celibate for one year. Under previous rules, men who have had sex with men are banned from donating indefinitely.

Africa right now is mired in chaos, violence, disease, and famine. They can barely feed themselves and keep their electric service functional, if they even have it. But because of that harshness they have amygdala development, which gives them exactly the type of general intelligence and healthy instinctual aversion to disease vectors that our liberal establishment and academia is lacking. We all know there have been cases of gay men with HIV who have purposely spread it. We know there is a deeper psychological derangement that tends to accompany homosexuality than merely the reversal of sexual preferences. And yet, now we allow anyone to contribute blood, not because the system had been broken, but because avoiding conflict and not being critical is more important than avoiding disease.

This is peak r, and it can only be cured by Apocalypse.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
8 years ago

[…] By Anonymous Conservative […]

Aeoli Pera
8 years ago

Lol, fuck this gay world.

ACThinker
ACThinker
8 years ago

I’m a little confused…. if Gay population (males) is about say 3% what reason do we think they will donate at a rate more than the general population? Adding another 3% of the population as possible blood donors is going to help? I mean if 5% of the general population gives blood, how is adding another little bit that gives at the same rate (5% of the sub population) going to really increase the blood supply?
So not only can they not think, but they can’t do basic math, but I repeat myself.

Byzantium Bosporus
Reply to  ACThinker
8 years ago

To be honest the ban does not make any sense anymore since we have the technology to detect HIV analogs/strains very fast and very cheap. As soon as blood is found to contain HIV it should be thrown away.

dc.sunsets
dc.sunsets
8 years ago

So now that more versions of hepatitis can be cured at phenomenal expense the Universalist Cathedral wants more virus in the blood supply.

A rational policy would be to pay professionally vetted donors with proven health background to provide blood. But no, we can’t have that, everyone in the food chain gets paid EXCEPT the person who brings the essential item.

We are surrounded by irrationality.

ROFL
ROFL
8 years ago

@AC
Sexual perversions (i.e. homosexuality) are co-morbid with psychopathy. Psychopaths (and narcissists) greatest motivator is the causation of pain. Use the blood of homos as a biological weapon and voilá … PAIN for the masses!

I mean, in case you were looking for a “why” to this.